Hampton Inn Manhattan Soho, New York City, Fresh

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Hampton Inn Manhattan Soho

OpinionWell
Rank

73rd

Out of 676

Hampton Inn Manhattan Soho	Average Price: $311 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

54 Watts Street

New York City, 10013 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 9 of 144
Average review rating: 4.54

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (36) , MyTravelGuide (11) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (322)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

adequate (16) affordable (13) awesome (22) beautiful (10) best (38) better (31) big (37) cares (12) clean (204) cleanliness (9) comfortable (113) comfy (17) convenient (43) decent (42) efficient (9) excellent (79) exceptional (11) fabulous (15) fantastic (33) fast (10) free (132) fresh (31) friendly (157) generous (9) good (237) great (313) happy (22) helpful (181) huge (18) impressed (14) liked (83) love (45) new (163) nice (180) outstanding (13) perfect (54) pleasant (31) pleased (11) plenty (30) positive (13) professional (12) quiet (34) reasonable (24) reasonably (9) soft (9) spacious (21) spotless (9) superb (9) welcoming (28) wonderful (24)

Fresh

Appears in 31 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Fresh:
breakfast (11) coffee (4) cold (3) food (3) fruit (14) good (6) great (3) hot (5) iron (4) not (3) offers (3) plus (2) reception (2) restful (2) return (2) room (7) selection (2) towel (2) walking (2) well (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. You'll find fresh coffee at any hour, too.

"Home Away from Home " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

2. those afternoon fresh cookies.

"Home Away from Home " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

3. Even late in the day, the breakfast room has juice, coffee and fresh fruit.

"Outstanding value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/22/2012 Vote

4. They were clean and fresh, just not as substantial as I'd hope.

"More than expected, no complaints " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

5. ' I admit, I liked having fresh towels.

"Great stay, good location, wonderful customer service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/23/2012 Vote

6. Cold cereals, fresh fruit, fruit salad, hard boiled eggs, yogurt, muffins, danishes, bagels, bread, and English muffins, jams, peanut butter, cream cheese, and instant oatmeal.

"A very enjoyable visit " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2012 Vote

7. They offer the typical free Hampton breakfast which was kept full and fresh.

"Less Than Memorable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/2/2012 Vote

8. the location was good too, very close to the subway, short walk from the cool soho shops, short walk from the stalls on canal street, and close to a great deli that we went to everyday to eat fresh fruit.

"a great location and helpful staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/29/2011 Vote

9. We had plans for breakfast, but did look at what was offered and it was your usual, fruit, waffles, etc and looked very fresh and good.

"CAN'T SAY ENOUGH GOOD THINGS!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/29/2011 Vote

10. They even provided a mini fridge and daily bottles of water and fresh cookies each afternoon.

"This is a great hotel for the price. The rooms were very clean and comfortable (for Manhattan room size standards). " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/17/2011 Vote