InnSuites Tucson City Center, Tucson, Bad

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Arizona » Tucson Destinations » Tucson Hotels » InnSuites Tucson City Center

OpinionWell
Rank

22nd

Out of 278

InnSuites Tucson City Center	Average Price: $108 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

475 North Granada Avenue

Tucson, 85701 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 5 of 58
Average review rating: 2.81

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (27) , MyTravelGuide (18) , Travelocity (8) , TripAdvisor (118) , YahooTravel (8)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (3) awful (8) bad (21) bare (3) broken (12) bugs (2) chipped (5) complain (6) damage (2) dated (5) dingy (2) dirty (21) disappoint (5) disgust (8) expensive (4) filthy (14) gross (8) hard (7) issue (8) loud (7) mess (2) mold (7) negative (2) noise (11) noisy (3) odor (2) outdated (3) overpriced (3) peeling (3) poor (9) poorly (2) problem (19) roach (2) rude (2) sad (3) shame (3) shock (4) slow (4) smell (9) smelly (2) stain (3) terrible (7) too small (2) unacceptable (3) uncomfortable (2) unfortunate (5) unsure (2) worn (8) worst (2) wrong (2)

Bad	Appears in 29 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bad:
area (2) bathroom (2) breakfast (2) carpet (2) drink (2) elevator (2) hotel (5) nice (3) not (4) overpriced (2) pool (2) pretty (3) queen (2) reviews (3) room (7) secure (2) service (5) suite (2) useful (2) worn (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Even with bad service, major amenities mysteriously closed -- and failure to provide a third bed, it was still a pretty good value.

"INTERESTING EXPERIENCE " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2012 Vote

2. -The hotel was in very bad physical shape with doors, elevators, etc.

"Only if you are desperate. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/27/2012 Vote

3. However, you can eat and drink decent food that's not ridiculously overpriced (yes, it's overpriced, but not as bad as at some hotels) and get competent and usually very nice service.

"Motel Tucson Railroad Dump is a FAR more accurate name " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/2/2011 Vote

4. Lots of parking, but please bring a car club and make sure your Lojak is up to spec -- this is the really bad side of the older part of Tucson and nothing about this place will give you the warm fuzzy feeling of safety and security, including the fact that the security doors NEVER needed a room key to be opened.

"Motel Tucson Railroad Dump is a FAR more accurate name " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/2/2011 Vote

5. My bad.

"Motel Tucson Railroad Dump is a FAR more accurate name " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/2/2011 Vote

6. We paid for a room with two queens but received one queen and one full, and the full was so bad I slept on the floor.

"This hotel was the only bad thing about our trip to Tucson " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/21/2011 Vote

7. I don't know where these bad reviews are coming from.

"I have never had a problem! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/17/2011 Vote

8. I have stayed some bad places but this was beyond it all.

"Avoid " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/24/2011 Vote

9. The bathroom was so bad we didn't even want to shower.

"Sadly run-down, old and unclean... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2011 Vote

10. The pool is nice and the breakfast is not bad at all.

"Not bad at all! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/4/2010 Vote