Flamingo Hotel Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Dirty

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Flamingo Hotel Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

40th

Out of 481

Flamingo Hotel Las Vegas	Average Price: $128 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3555 Las Vegas Boulevard South

Las Vegas, 89109 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 11 of 92
Average review rating: 3.47

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (43) , Expedia (111) , MyTravelGuide (454) , Travelocity (203) , TripAdvisor (4938) , YahooTravel (368)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (97) avoid (108) awful (119) bad (702) bed bugs (57) big deal (71) broken (139) chipped (79) complain (342) complaint (179) dated (216) difficult (55) dirt (71) dirty (858) disappoint (346) disgust (178) dump (75) expensive (279) filthy (253) gross (107) hard (240) horrible (179) issue (299) lack (85) loud (252) mistake (79) mold (161) nasty (81) negative (218) noise (233) noisy (112) outdated (127) overpriced (95) peeling (56) poor (162) pricey (70) problem (565) ridiculous (66) rock (55) rude (220) slow (159) smell (410) stain (58) tear (72) terrible (174) uncomfortable (54) unfortunate (103) worn (256) worst (205) wrong (148)

Dirty

Appears in 910 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Dirty:
area (34) bathroom (103) bed (62) carpet (256) clean (92) elevator (71) floor (84) furniture (33) hallway (90) hotel (107) liked (46) not (165) old (95) pool (59) room (513) service (34) shower (43) stains (121) wall (37) worn (53)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The one bad thing in the room was the couch at the foot of the bed -- nasty dirty i am sure it has been cleaned but it is really stained.

"Good location -- more of a 3.5 than a 4 " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

2. Did I mention the place was dirty.

"Great location.. That's about it. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

3. The hotel is old, dirty and really crowded.

"Great location.. That's about it. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2012 Vote

4. It was very dirty too.

"Terrible Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/14/2012 Vote

5. The elevators were dirty and old looking and upon our arrival on the 6th floor, the hallway carpets were all warped and dirty.

"In desperate need of an update " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2012 Vote

6. The hallway carpet was dirty and smelly and our room was a bit shabby.

"book the 'Go' room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2012 Vote

7. The counter was newer and the air vent wasn't dirty.

"Room okay - casino not great " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/6/2012 Vote

8. The step up comes from the replacement of the old dirty and stained carpet.

"New FAB room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

9. The room was dusty, dirty, and the air conditioning system squeaked and screamed the whole time - plus the vent cover worked itself loose and fell open, dropping two EXTREMELY filthy filters on the floor and spraying dust and dirt all over the place, including into the closet and onto our clothes.

"Definitely not Fab " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

10. We noticed that the carpets in the hallways were very dirty and worn, loose in places with lots of marks on the walls.

"Don't think we will return to the Flamingo " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/29/2012 Vote