New York Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Inconvenient

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » New York Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

8th

Out of 481

New York Las Vegas	Average Price: $127 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3790 Las Vegas Boulevard South

Las Vegas, 89109 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 2 of 28
Average review rating: 3.79

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (110) , MyTravelGuide (130) , Travelocity (140) , TripAdvisor (2613) , YahooTravel (260)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (71) avoid (39) awful (36) bad (258) big deal (39) chipped (39) complain (105) complaint (92) cramped (22) crap (28) dated (54) difficult (36) dirty (88) disappoint (197) disturbing (31) downside (38) expensive (169) frustrated (24) hard (130) hardly (28) hassle (21) horrible (50) inconvenient (23) issue (127) lack (43) loud (139) mistake (24) negative (85) noise (264) noisy (97) outdated (26) overpriced (43) poor (62) pricey (52) problem (265) ridiculous (35) rock (42) rude (76) slow (86) smell (126) smoker (31) terrible (69) tiny (35) too small (21) ugly (116) uncomfortable (34) unfortunate (38) worn (30) worst (63) wrong (79)

Inconvenient

Appears in 29 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Inconvenient:
$ (2) clean (2) coupons (3) deal (2) discount (2) eat (2) fee (2) hard (2) hotel (7) nice (3) night (3) not (6) pool (5) prompt (2) room (9) upgraded (2) useful (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The 2 free drink tickets was a nice gesture for the inconvenience.

"Great Time " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2012 Vote

2. I would think that they would do away with the resort fees for this inconvenience.

"Fun, exciting place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2012 Vote

3. Access to the other pools was so inconvenient that nobody in our party chose to traipse through the walkways and two casinos to access the other pools.

"Adequate, Decent " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/26/2012 Vote

4. The pool was being refurbished which was inconvenient as temperatures in Vegas were hitting over 80, on check in we were told we could use the pools at the MGM Grand and Monte Carlo.

"Average Hotel by Vegas Standards! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/13/2012 Vote

5. I called my credit card company and got the fee reversed but this was a inconvenience for me.

"poor cust. service - they hung up on me " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/7/2012 Vote

6. Our room was directly overlooking the roller coaster, however we did not hear it, so it was fun to look at without the inconvenience of being disturbed.

"Nice and comfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/25/2011 Vote

7. It was kind of inconvenient.

"Can't wait to go back! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/15/2011 Vote

8. My only complaint is a minor one, which was a room service table with half-eaten food left outside our door for 2 days, but they promptly discounted my room for the inconvenience.

"Excellent stay & good value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/23/2011 Vote

9. The hotel doesn't have a buffet which was an inconvenience but not anything we couldn't deal with.

"Average stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/18/2010 Vote

10. We received several discount coupons for our inconvenience, of no value to us.

"Not Happy " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/27/2009 Vote