Crowne Plaza Union Square, San Francisco, Tiny

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Crowne Plaza Union Square

OpinionWell
Rank

86th

Out of 493

Crowne Plaza Union Square	Average Price: $251 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

480 Sutter Street

San Francisco, 94108 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 31 of 37
Average review rating: 4

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (16) , MyTravelGuide (532) , Travelocity (13) , Expedia (30) , TripAdvisor (392)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (3) annoy (3) avoid (4) bad (17) barely (3) big deal (3) broke (2) chipped (2) complain (4) complaint (6) cramped (5) dated (3) difficult (2) dirty (5) disappoint (16) downside (5) expensive (30) hard (10) horrible (2) inconvenient (3) issue (14) lack (5) loud (8) negative (11) noise (48) noisy (10) odor (2) outrageous (7) overpriced (6) poor (4) pricey (7) problem (32) ridiculous (4) rude (16) shame (4) shock (6) slow (2) smell (8) terrible (4) tiny (14) too small (3) uncomfortable (2) unfortunate (4) unfriendly (2) unhelpful (2) unpleasant (3) unsure (3) worst (6) would have liked (3) wrong (8)

Tiny	Appears in 18 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Tiny:
barely (2) bathroom (14) good (2) hotel (2) nice (2) not (2) room (6) sink (5) size (3) smoke (2) toiletries (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. I read many accounts of the bathrooms being on the small side and I would say this is the very tiny, only bad thing about this entire hotel, which is really saying a lot.

"Absolutely Wonderful Hotel! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

2. , mini vegetable spring rolls that were mostly fried dough with limited vegetable filling), a tiny vegetable 'salad', and a cold antipasto tray that usually included slices of sausage, cheese, and olives.

"Nice room, tiny bathroom " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/4/2012 Vote

3. It was tiny with limited space for tools (hair brushes, shavers, toothbrush/toothpaste, etc.

"Nice room, tiny bathroom " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/4/2012 Vote

4. It had a tiny sink and I had to lean over the toilet to put on make up using the mirror.

"Nice location - Tiny bathroom " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/5/2012 Vote

5. The bathroom consisted of a very tiny sink placed into a wooden pedastal with little room around the sink for bathroom toiletries.

"NOT THE MARRIOTTS WE ARE USED TO " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/10/2011 Vote

6. The bathroom was also tiny, with no room to put toiletries.

"Not the quality I expected " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/4/2011 Vote

7. The bathroom is tiny -- one sink and the counter is barely large enough to go around the sink.

"No Rest for the Weary " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/18/2011 Vote

8. The room was nicely appointed, although the bathroom was TINY, the rest of the room experience made up for it.

"Beautifully remodeled Mariott " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/5/2010 Vote

9. Plus the bathroom was eco--a nice touch, but the vanity was tiny and no counter space.

"Hotel was clean, but upgrade for view not worth it " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/29/2009 Vote

10. Bathroom was stupidly tiny and there was no full length mirror in room but other than that, excellent.

"Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/28/2009 Vote