Hotel Adagio San Francisco, San Francisco, Ignored

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Hotel Adagio San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

52nd

Out of 493

Hotel Adagio San Francisco	Average Price: $211 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

550 Geary Street

San Francisco, 94102 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 17 of 110
Average review rating: 4.09

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , Expedia (43) , MyTravelGuide (11) , Travelocity (11) , TripAdvisor (595) , YahooTravel (13)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (4) annoy (9) annoyance (4) avoid (9) bad (21) big deal (5) broken (4) complain (8) complaint (12) dated (4) difficult (8) dingy (3) dirty (6) disappoint (26) disturbing (4) downside (7) expensive (25) filthy (5) hard (11) hassle (5) ignored (5) inconvenient (6) issue (17) lack (11) loud (18) miserable (3) mistake (3) mold (3) negative (10) noise (69) noisy (31) outdated (4) poor (8) pricey (6) problem (34) ridiculous (4) rough (5) rude (7) slow (8) smell (11) stained (4) terrible (3) tiny (8) ugly (4) uncomfortable (5) unfortunate (13) unsafe (6) worn (4) worst (6) wrong (16)

Ignored

Appears in 9 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Ignored:
does (2) few (2) ignore (9) location (2) most (2) night (2) panhandlers (2) simply (2) street (2) walking (5)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. Lots of beggars around but we never felt unsafe or threatened and just walked on and ignored them.

"Nice enough for a short stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/5/2012 Vote

2. However, if you were to walk briskly and ignore the panhandlers you will be fine.

"Great Service, shame about the location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/11/2012 Vote

3. But the whole 'just ignore them' rule works and is what I do at home so I can't really complain but folks from cities that do not have large homeless populations may be taken aback.

"SFO Value Find " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/29/2011 Vote

4. Apparently they'd been telling the group to quieten down all day and they just been ignored.

"Comfortable Hotel, Great Food. Free Wi Fi " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/14/2011 Vote

5. The location is probably two blocks further away from Union Square than ideal (The Westin and Hilton are closer by about two blocks), and this does mean you encounter a fair few homeless and street beggars on a late night walk back but most are non threatening and simply bet ignored.

"Good value and reasonable quality close to Union Square " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/1/2010 Vote

6. The location is probably two blocks further away from Union Square than ideal (The Westin and Hilton are closer by about two blocks), and this does mean you encounter a fair few homeless and street beggars on a late night walk back but most are non threatening and simply bet ignored.

"Good value and reasonable quality close to Union Square " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/1/2010 Vote

7. i just ignored them pretty much.

"Pleasant Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/8/2009 Vote

8. or b) ignore the panhandlers and quickly walk around them.

"Love this place! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/30/2007 Vote

9. Rude , ignorant staff in restaurants and on trams took the shine off those that were courteous and polite.

"pretty nice- could have been better " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/22/2005 Vote