JW Marriott Hotel Washington DC, Washington DC, Bath

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » JW Marriott Hotel Washington DC

OpinionWell
Rank

28th

Out of 279

JW Marriott Hotel Washington DC	Average Price: $497 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1331 Pennsylvania Avenue NorthWest

Washington DC, 20004 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 8 of 30
Average review rating: 4.59

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (35) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (612) , YahooTravel (81)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (28) bar (67) bath (16) bathroom (119) bed (105) bill (27) breakfast (153) charge (52) check in (72) check out (15) complimentary (13) concierge (114) cost (50) deal (42) dinner (54) downtown (18) fitness center (16) food (139) front desk (75) gym (24) hot tub (14) hotel (1080) housekeeping (24) lobby (182) location (471) lunch (21) manager (21) money (22) parking (70) pillow (39) pool (131) price (96) rate (113) recommend (69) restaurant (193) room (934) room service (52) service (233) sheets (12) shower (40) staff (269) street (76) suite (39) towel (26) valet (54) valet parking (25) value (22) view (179) walk (168) wireless (48)

Bath	Appears in 16 comments. 75% wrote positive comments about bath

The following words were used in comments with Bath:
comfortable (2) heating (2) iron (2) large (2) nice (2) plenty (3) pool (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The bath products were also wonderful.

"Gorgeous hotel, can't wait to go back " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

2. Standard room size, standard bath tub, comfortable bedding, and wi-fi worked fine.

"Nice, clean business-class hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/16/2010 Vote

3. The bathroom was clean and had plenty of towels and bath products.

"Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/13/2010 Vote

4. Bath was spacious, but miss the TOWEL BARS that Marriott seems to not install when renovating their rooms.

"Just the Best! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/15/2008 Vote

5. They have great showers, huge baths, etc. I have a feeling Marriott just called this one JW so no one would confuse it with the Metro Center.

"Great location, very good hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/17/2007 Vote

6. The bath products provided had a nice aroma and were replenished daily.

"Great location, nice room, impersonal staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/12/2007 Vote

7. In the bath, there wasn't enough room for the bath mat in front of the tub; the toilet was in the way.

"Convenient but expensive " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

8. The room itself was an average standard room a little small than I expected and the bathroom a little old, didn't even have a fan in the ceiling making it very foggy after a bath.

"Great location!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/10/2011 Vote

9. Bring your bathing suit.

"perfect location for walking the monuments " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/16/2011 Vote

10. A king bed in the wall could be retracted during the day and pulled down at night, and one and one-half baths, a wet bar, a living area, and enough space for two rollaway beds (with a lot of room to spare) make this the ideal family room.

"Luxurious Pennsylvania Avenue Family Favorite " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/2/2011 Vote