Hotel Palomar San Francisco - a Kimpton Hotel, San Francisco, Bath

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Hotel Palomar San Francisco - a Kimpton Hotel

Back to search results

OpinionWell
Rank

50th

Out of 493

Hotel Palomar San Francisco - a Kimpton Hotel	Average Price: $314 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

12 Fourth Street

San Francisco, 94103 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 26 of 37
Average review rating: 4.3

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (12) , MyTravelGuide (162) , Travelocity (6) , Expedia (44) , TripAdvisor (579)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (34) bar (58) bath (29) bathroom (101) beach (9) bed (101) breakfast (76) charge (13) check in (54) check out (15) checkout (10) closet (15) complimentary (38) concierge (36) cost (18) deal (23) decor (34) dinner (31) downtown (24) food (54) front desk (112) gym (21) hotel (889) housekeeping (14) lobby (60) location (329) manager (13) mini bar (10) mini-bar (9) money (16) parking (30) pillow (23) price (61) rate (47) recommend (73) restaurant (183) room (709) room service (21) service (149) shower (37) staff (299) street (152) suite (36) tub (25) valet (17) valet parking (11) value (21) view (62) walk (87) wireless (29)

Bath	Appears in 29 comments. 50% wrote positive comments about bath

The following words were used in comments with Bath:
comfy (3) free (2) great (3) hotel (4) love (3) nice (5) robe (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Towels were nice and fluffy, and they also had a nice assortment of free bath products, including toothpaste, q-tips and the usual shampoo and conditioner.

"Modern, clubby, sumptuous, well-situated with mostly great service. Gym sucks. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/26/2012 Vote

2. The room, while small, was well-appointed with nice bath products and linens and a very comfortable bed.

"Great location, very nice boutique hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/23/2012 Vote

3. The hotel beds are very comfy and lots of pillows, Hotel provides funky bath robes, to keep with the 'feast for the eye' theme.

"Very nice place in San Fran " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/29/2011 Vote

4. The L'Occitane bath products were a great bonus as well.

"Great location, wonderful Kimpton amenities " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/26/2010 Vote

5. If only the Kimpton had a whirlpool bath and a free continental breakfast, this hotel would be perfect.

"The Palomar " Read full review on Expedia 12/31/2009 Vote

6. I purposely booked a luxury king with the Fugi soaking tub, because I love to take baths while on vacation.

"Amazing hotel but..... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/8/2009 Vote

7. " I think great, I will have a bath before I leave.

"Amazing hotel but..... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/8/2009 Vote

8. Awesome L'Occitane bath products.

"Great Location, great accomodations, food and fun! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2009 Vote

9. The rooms were lovely and spacious and the bathroom (especially the bath/tub) was really nice.

"a great spot " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/20/2008 Vote

10. Bathroom was nice, though the sliding door was a little weird (as opposed to a normal door leading to a bathroom), and I LOVED the l`Occitane bath products.

"Would stay here again! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/25/2008 Vote