Maison Dupuy Hotel New Orleans, New Orleans, Better

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Louisiana » New Orleans Destinations » New Orleans Hotels » Maison Dupuy Hotel New Orleans

OpinionWell
Rank

16th

Out of 427

Maison Dupuy Hotel New Orleans	Average Price: $198 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1001 Toulouse Street

New Orleans, 70112 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 7 of 125
Average review rating: 3.71

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (70) , TripAdvisor (631) , YahooTravel (22)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (12) accommodating (23) adequate (14) attentive (16) awesome (19) beautiful (131) best (94) better (70) big (48) cares (38) clean (288) comfortable (182) comfy (27) convenient (33) cool (12) courteous (21) decent (21) efficient (21) elegant (12) excellent (85) exceptional (28) fabulous (20) fantastic (25) free (72) fresh (16) friendly (226) fun (31) generous (16) good (249) great (379) happy (38) helpful (186) huge (15) liked (165) love (101) new (300) nice (316) outstanding (16) perfect (87) pleasant (48) pleased (14) plenty (28) positive (14) professional (18) quiet (101) reasonable (42) responsive (15) spacious (17) welcoming (23) wonderful (106)

Better

Appears in 85 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Better:
courtyard (4) deal (4) expectation (6) good (9) helpful (4) hotel (34) location (9) money (4) most (4) much (13) new (13) not (8) price (5) recommend (7) reviews (4) room (18) service (6) staff (6) view (4) wondering (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The walls appear to have better sound proofing as we've never heard a peep from guests in adjacent rooms.

"Great Place to Stay in French Quarter " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

2. This is my first time writing a review but could not find a number to complain about all of the bad things so hopefully this will help them to better their staff.

"Terrible service!!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/26/2012 Vote

3. Many other boutique hotels with comparable prices and much better accomodations and service.

"Poor service & small rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/15/2012 Vote

4. There are plenty of better choices in the French Quarter for the money.

"Much better choices for the money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/27/2011 Vote

5. for $15, i've had the same if not a little better at a Limited Service Hotel.

"Surprise! Surprise! Surprise!!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/3/2011 Vote

6. However, due to other problems I would not stay here again unless I can find a better place at the time.

"Stay here for location only " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/28/2011 Vote

7. I was not too impressed with the restaurant, but just had a sandwich, so maybe other fare was better.

"Blissfully quiet " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/21/2011 Vote

8. I would expect a better experience from a hotel with this reputation and this pricetag.

"Don't forget the customers.. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/15/2011 Vote

9. The Royal Sonesta had rooms available and at a better price with an upgrade to a king suite.

"DO NOT STAY AT THIS HOTEL " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/7/2011 Vote

10. the beds and pillows are better than home.

"We checked in yesterday...I was a little nervous because of recent reviews I read.. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/28/2011 Vote