Hyatt Regency Chicago, Chicago, Comfy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Hyatt Regency Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

35th

Out of 415

Hyatt Regency Chicago	Average Price: $274 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

151 East Wacker Drive

Chicago, 60601 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 17 of 39
Average review rating: 3.63

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (48) , MyTravelGuide (8689) , Travelocity (79) , TripAdvisor (1701) , YahooTravel (163)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (48) awesome (70) beautiful (131) best (168) better (210) big (295) cares (76) cheaper (34) clean (612) comfortable (408) comfy (54) convenient (152) cool (50) courteous (55) decent (78) delicious (30) efficient (78) excellent (234) exceptional (76) fabulous (40) fantastic (95) fast (57) free (287) fresh (49) friendly (449) fun (63) good (749) great (1244) happy (83) helpful (423) huge (208) liked (469) love (106) magnificent (134) new (165) nice (923) outstanding (30) perfect (161) perfectly (29) pleasant (76) pleased (48) plenty (95) positive (41) professional (54) quiet (124) reasonable (105) spacious (114) spectacular (40) welcoming (62) wonderful (156)

Comfy

Appears in 130 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Comfy:
bar (6) bathroom (13) bed (113) big (8) chair (6) clean (17) decorate (8) extremely (6) good (8) great (22) large (7) location (13) nice (28) not (6) pillow (23) room (65) service (8) size (7) super (9) view (9)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Only problem: bed was too comfy.

"Great Location. Great Place. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/14/2012 Vote

2. The bathroom is very nice and the bed was very comfy.

"Very convenient, great value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/21/2012 Vote

3. Bed was extremely comfy, TV was a new LED flatscreen and the bathroom was extremely spacious and modern.

"Great Place near Mag Mile " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/21/2012 Vote

4. We had an amazing room on the 27th floor with a huge comfy bed, I struggle with sleep ( or lack of) so this was really beneficial and I got great sleep .

"Going above and Beyond!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/20/2012 Vote

5. The rooms are nice and the renovated bathrooms are clean and comfy, but a previous review was correct in that there is a lighting issue (most rooms I have stayed in are very dark).

"Central location with great access to Lakefront and Loop " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/29/2012 Vote

6. ), in the middle are big comfy chairs, and to the left is check-in.

"Great location, comfortable bed/rooms, beautiful front lobby " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/28/2012 Vote

7. Some colleagues bemoaned the lack of HD TV and the Irish bar not open for lunch, but a big comfy bed and plenty of facilities nearby far outweighed this for me.

"Impressive for business " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/10/2012 Vote

8. Oh and the beds were suuuper comfy.

"Great stay!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/22/2011 Vote

9. The beds were so comfy, my only problem with the room was the bathroom.

"Wonderful hotels with lots to do " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/19/2011 Vote

10. The bed was comfy but the cots could have been better.

"Central location with friendly staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/17/2011 Vote