Comfort Inn New York, New York City, Unbeatable

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Comfort Inn New York

OpinionWell
Rank

110th

Out of 676

Comfort Inn New York	Average Price: $258 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

129 West 46th Street

New York City, 10036 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 15 of 144
Average review rating: 4.17

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (1) , MyTravelGuide (23) , TripAdvisor (702) , YahooTravel (28)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (8) adequate (28) affordable (18) best (54) better (59) big (55) cares (21) clean (338) cleanliness (10) comfortable (266) comfy (16) convenient (46) cool (9) courteous (20) cozy (8) decent (32) efficient (15) excellent (102) exceptional (20) fabulous (10) fantastic (29) fast (12) free (187) fresh (24) friendly (207) good (239) great (291) happy (23) helpful (204) huge (16) immaculate (8) liked (94) love (30) new (165) nice (194) perfect (68) perfectly (12) pleasant (43) pleased (18) plenty (47) positive (15) professional (12) quiet (115) reasonable (32) reasonably (8) spacious (12) spotless (15) unbeatable (9) welcoming (13) wonderful (29)

Unbeatable

Appears in 13 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Unbeatable:
clean (2) great (2) hotel (7) location (11) night (2) not (2) price (5) rating (2) room (2) value (2) walking (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The location of the hotel is unbeatable being situated at little brazil street and times square, madamme tussauds, planet hollywood etc all just a short walk away.

"Good with some room for improvements " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/28/2012 Vote

2. Yes the room is small and the washroom is tiny but the location is unbeatable for the pirce we pay.

"Excellent rate and location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2011 Vote

3. Hotel location is unbeatable, just half a block from Times Square, and 1 1/2 blocks from subway, super convenient.

"Excellent location and service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/9/2011 Vote

4. Although the rates are steals given this hotel's unbeatable location (literally a one minute walk to Times Sq and the Rockefeller center), this shouldn't mask the fact that this is not a great place.

"Decent option for cheaper stay in Manhattan " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/13/2009 Vote

5. It is an unbeatable value for the location.

"We will be back! This is a winner! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/13/2009 Vote

6. The hotel and the rooms were very clean and the location is unbeatable for the price.

"Fantastic Hotel Great Location & Price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2008 Vote

7. It may not be the fanciest luxury hotel in Manhattan, but for the price it`s unbeatable.

"Excellent location and excellent value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/7/2008 Vote

8. But this one`s location was unbeatable and LESS EXPENSIVE (Why??).

"Unbeatable for the location, comfort and PRICE (NYC price) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/4/2008 Vote

9. And the mature rate price was unbeatable for Times Square location.

"Perfect spot for Times Square Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/29/2007 Vote

10. The best part of this hotel was the unbeatable price of $110 per night.

"Clean with a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/15/2006 Vote