Hilton Garden Inn Times Square, New York City, Good

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Hilton Garden Inn Times Square

OpinionWell
Rank

6th

Out of 676

Hilton Garden Inn Times Square	Average Price: $340 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

790 Eighth Avenue

New York City, 10019 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 154
Average review rating: 4.21

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (83) , MyTravelGuide (5043) , Travelocity (12) , TripAdvisor (1756) , YahooTravel (23)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (59) adequate (35) attentive (43) awesome (48) best (212) better (154) big (170) cares (58) cheaper (35) clean (930) cleanliness (33) comfortable (513) comfy (69) convenient (204) courteous (56) decent (76) efficient (66) excellent (350) exceptional (67) fabulous (44) fantastic (151) fast (43) free (400) fresh (65) friendly (688) fun (44) good (874) great (1413) happy (100) helpful (731) huge (67) impressed (41) liked (296) love (136) new (564) nice (685) outstanding (46) perfect (283) perfectly (41) pleasant (98) pleased (61) plenty (78) positive (66) professional (53) quiet (204) reasonable (140) reasonably (42) spacious (174) welcoming (128) wonderful (200)

Good	Appears in 2071 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Good:
bed (135) breakfast (130) clean (227) comfortable (107) excellent (76) experience (80) food (105) friendly (76) great (216) hotel (550) location (666) nice (154) night (80) not (167) price (134) room (520) service (206) size (189) staff (140) value (126)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Had read the previous reviews on Tripadvisor which were very good.

"friendly and customer service oriented staff make the difference " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2012 Vote

2. I always read reviews before booking a hotel ,If most people give a good review and I don't read the words 'dirty bathroom,dirty sheets or bed bugs 'I would book with that hotel and this was one of them.

"Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

3. Keep up the good work.

"Personalized Attention " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/14/2012 Vote

4. good clean hotel, very nice inside.

"best location for times square ( and clean too) " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/11/2012 Vote

5. and it's still good.

"Back Again, Still Satisfied " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

6. For the most part nothing a good set of earplugs didn't solve.

"Great location and wonderful staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

7. The hotel was very good.

"Very Good NYC hotel-Very clean great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

8. good stuff.

"Very Good NYC hotel-Very clean great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

9. Some of the things that were outstanding were; fresh Starbucks coffee in the lobby every morning, friendly and helpful front desk staff/bell staff/concierge, very good buffet breakfast in the restaurant next door (complimentary to some of us HHonors members), and maid service.

"Excellent Stay in Every Way " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/5/2012 Vote

10. The room was a decent size for NYC and the hotel looked in good shape and had the good linens we've come to expect from Hiltons.

"Very Convenient " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/4/2012 Vote