Affinia 50, New York City, Decent

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Affinia 50

OpinionWell
Rank

62nd

Out of 676

Affinia 50	Average Price: $373 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

155 East 50th Street

New York City, 10022 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 20 of 154
Average review rating: 4.54

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (62) , Travelocity (28) , TripAdvisor (988) , YahooTravel (39)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (20) adequate (21) attentive (19) awesome (25) best (118) better (77) big (106) cares (38) clean (346) cleanliness (17) comfortable (327) comfy (48) convenient (54) cool (18) courteous (23) decent (22) efficient (25) excellent (135) exceptional (25) fabulous (27) fantastic (68) free (135) fresh (17) friendly (378) fun (28) generous (17) good (358) great (652) happy (43) helpful (349) huge (94) impressed (28) liked (194) love (110) new (290) nice (390) perfect (101) pleasant (44) pleased (35) plenty (75) positive (23) professional (16) quiet (76) reasonable (46) reasonably (23) spacious (123) spotless (18) terrific (21) welcoming (91) wonderful (94)

Decent

Appears in 32 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Decent:
bathroom (4) bed (6) clean (4) couple (2) decorate (3) excellent (2) expectation (4) good (3) great (7) hotel (10) location (7) pretty (3) price (5) quality (2) rating (2) room (14) size (11) staff (4) view (2) walking (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. If you are looking for a decent room at a good decent price this is your hotel.

"Good hotel. More like an apartment in the suites. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/31/2012 Vote

2. Overall, a decent hotel with helpful staff in a great location (but insomniacs beware.

"Great location, friendly service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/30/2011 Vote

3. Great location and decent rooms but lack of staff can be a real irritant starting with long queues on check in, getting a bellman or getting a plastic ice bucket which housekeeping had forgotten.

"Very skimpy on hiring help " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/11/2011 Vote

4. Room: I stayed at the most basic room which is of decent size by NYC standards.

"Good Value and Location, Needs Better Housekeeping " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/7/2010 Vote

5. It was clean and decent furnishings, but not the Ritz Carlton.

"Overall, a good place to stay in NYC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/19/2010 Vote

6. We had a decent sized bedroom with a separate office area and a huge bathroom.

"Good Value, Great Location, Service...meh " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/16/2010 Vote

7. Gym was decent with ellipticals, treadmills, bike and some weights.

"Great rooms and location but unfortunately I'll never come back " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/8/2010 Vote

8. With 1 king bed, it was a decent size room.

"Exceptional Value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/2/2010 Vote

9. However, the bed was decently comfortable and the location was good for me.

"Probably good for families, not so great for business " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/30/2010 Vote

10. The room was a decent size - enough room to tuck our suitcases away into the closet along with our clothes - and with a digital safe for valuables.

"Great hotel and location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/10/2009 Vote