Willard InterContinental Washington, Washington DC, Expensive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Willard InterContinental Washington

OpinionWell
Rank

27th

Out of 279

Willard InterContinental Washington	Average Price: $534 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1401 Pennsylvania Avenue NorthWest

Washington DC, 20004 View map

5-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 12
Average review rating: 4.57

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (27) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (423) , YahooTravel (40)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (5) annoy (2) awful (2) bad (11) bit dated (3) broken (3) chipped (2) complain (8) complaint (12) cramped (3) dated (6) delay (2) dirty (3) disappoint (30) disturbing (5) downside (4) expensive (35) hard (10) hassle (4) horrible (9) ignored (2) inconvenient (6) issue (13) lack (11) lazy (4) loud (6) lousy (2) lukewarm (2) mistake (3) mold (3) nasty (3) negative (13) noise (14) noisy (4) overcharged (2) overpriced (6) peeling (2) poor (13) poorly (2) pricey (15) problem (22) ridiculous (3) rude (12) shock (5) slow (9) smell (3) terrible (6) unfortunate (5) worn (2) wrong (7)

Expensive

Appears in 43 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Expensive:
$ (5) bargain (2) breakfast (5) charged (4) expectation (3) expense (43) good (5) great (3) hotel (14) much (9) not (8) price (4) quality (2) rating (4) ridiculous (3) room (5) service (3) special (3) well (4) wifi (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. But this one was something special (and probably, the most expensive place my company ever booked for my business trips :) ).

"Unforgettable sleep! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

2. I would love to stay in the hotel again, but probably wont because I am sure it is too expensive for me.

"Very nice hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/20/2012 Vote

3. My one complaint was that the breakfast at the Cafe du Parc was only fair, and very expensive.

"Classy but expensive, at the right address ... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2012 Vote

4. Of course there would be a charge for internet use (I find the more expensive the hotel, the more they nickel and dime you) but I didn't bring my laptop for a 2 day jaunt anyway.

"location, location, location... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/5/2012 Vote

5. Parking is very expensive in any large metro area and the valet was speedy and courteous.

"Location and amenities...perfect! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/6/2012 Vote

6. VERY expensive.

"New Years at The Willard " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/6/2012 Vote

7. It's expensive, but well worth it.

"Historic hotel in a great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/24/2011 Vote

8. I will complain bitterley about being charged over $10 per day per device for wifi on top of a very expensive room rate ( hence the poor rating on value).

"Great place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/20/2011 Vote

9. The Willard is expensive but for a quality, historic hotel next to the White House that is to be expected.

"Quality Property, Excellent Service, Worth the Expense " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/2/2011 Vote

10. The only downside was the weather forced us into a lot of cabs which are very expensive.

"weekend in dc with the kids " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/1/2011 Vote