Opal Hotel San Francisco, San Francisco, Lack

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Opal Hotel San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

49th

Out of 493

Opal Hotel San Francisco	Average Price: $133 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1050 Van Ness Avenue

San Francisco, 94109 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 16 of 110
Average review rating: 3.55

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (12) , Expedia (43) , MyTravelGuide (532) , Travelocity (22) , TripAdvisor (311) , YahooTravel (20)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (4) avoid (9) awful (4) bad (47) barely (5) bed bugs (29) big deal (5) broken (6) bug (4) complain (16) complaint (6) dangerous (4) dirty (8) disappoint (17) disgust (6) disturbing (6) downside (6) expensive (18) exterminator (6) hard (16) horrible (11) issue (22) itchy (7) lack (6) loud (13) mold (4) negative (12) noise (39) noisy (10) odor (4) poor (10) pricey (4) problem (50) ridiculous (7) rough (5) rude (9) scary (7) shabby (6) shock (6) slow (12) smell (32) stain (4) stale (4) terrible (12) tiny (11) uncomfortable (7) unfortunate (8) worn (4) worst (8) wrong (6)

Lack	Appears in 15 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Lack:
area (2) breakfast (4) bus (2) charm (2) convenient (2) hallway (2) hotel (4) lacking (15) location (2) most (2) noise (2) not (4) old (2) park (3) room (3) soundproof (2) staff (2) view (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The faded glory of what used to be a decent hotel is not enough to make up for the lack of amenities and run-down facilities.

"Run-down and running utilities..... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/1/2012 Vote

2. The old drawback is lack of soundproofing in the walls/doors when other guests were not mindful to keep their voices down in the hallways (I should have suggested that on my comment card).

"Great Location for Concerts/Symphony/Ballet " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/21/2011 Vote

3. On the plus side the reception manager waived our car parking charges in view of our lack of sleep caused by the noise and the staff were all friendly enough.

"Good Location - Noise Problem For Older People " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/8/2009 Vote

4. the only negative was noise could be heard from the hallways when people were leaving their rooms, that is down to the lack of soundproofing in an old hotel which is to be expected.

"Reliable public bus service on doorstep and own bathroom !! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/24/2008 Vote

5. It does lack pay-per-view movies, which we could live without.

"Great location and value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/22/2008 Vote

6. The breakfast was severly lacking.

"shockingly bad " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2008 Vote

7. The continental breakfast was the same every morning for the three mornings we were there, and lacks variety (i.

"Great for the Budget-Minded " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/30/2007 Vote

8. lack of experience of front desk staff.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 5/5/2007 Vote

9. lack of parking.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 1/4/2007 Vote

10. The breakfast, which was included in our room rental, was lacking.

Read full review on MyTravelGuide 9/2/2006 Vote