Laurel Inn San Francisco, San Francisco, Bad

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Laurel Inn San Francisco

OpinionWell
Rank

112th

Out of 493

Laurel Inn San Francisco	Average Price: $190 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

444 Presidio Avenue

San Francisco, 94115 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 50 of 110
Average review rating: 4.28

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (11) , MyTravelGuide (19) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (140) , YahooTravel (7)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (2) awful (2) bad (5) chipped (2) complaint (5) difficult (2) dirty (2) disappoint (6) disgust (2) expensive (8) fussy (1) grungy (2) hard (7) hassle (3) hated (1) horrible (1) issue (4) lack (2) loud (9) mess (1) noise (21) noisy (7) odor (2) outdated (2) overpriced (3) pricey (2) problem (12) rude (2) shock (2) slow (1) smell (3) smelly (1) sophisticated (1) stained (3) stale (2) stink (1) sub par (1) terrible (3) tiny (3) too small (1) ugly (1) unacceptable (3) unbearable (1) uncomfortable (4) unfortunate (3) unhappy (1) unpleasant (1) worn (3) would have liked (1) wrong (1)

Bad	Appears in 6 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Bad:
experience (2) hotel (5) never (2) room (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. I was sharing a double with my daughter and it was so bad.

"not bad " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/12/2011 Vote

2. not a bad deal at all and we were able to park each day in the lot attached to the hotel without fear of no vacancy whatever time we arrived to the hotel in the evening.

"Great Find in San Francisco " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/1/2011 Vote

3. I have never had a bad experience at this hotel.

"AMAZING hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/26/2010 Vote

4. I have never had a bad experience at this hotel.

"AMAZING hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/26/2010 Vote

5. Maybe other rooms weren't so bad, but for us, it was a disaster.

"Rooms by "Swank" are a disaster " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/20/2010 Vote

6. City noise wasn`t too bad except for the low bass vibrations which we guessed were coming from the hotel bar below our room - earplugs did the trick.

"Good deal but still a city hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/3/2005 Vote