Bedford Hotel, New York City, Tiny

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New York » New York Destinations » New York Hotels » Bedford Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

193rd

Out of 676

Bedford Hotel	Average Price: $276 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

118 East 40th Street

New York City, 10016 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 65 of 154
Average review rating: 3.74

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (32) , MyTravelGuide (1) , Travelocity (3) , TripAdvisor (362) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

avoid (3) awful (3) bad (16) big deal (2) bit dated (3) broken (6) chipped (2) complain (8) complaint (8) cram (2) dated (15) difficult (4) dingy (4) dirty (9) disappoint (13) dispute (3) downside (8) expensive (8) filthy (3) hard (14) hardly (3) issue (6) lack (5) loud (6) negative (9) noise (25) noisy (23) outdated (5) overcharged (2) overpriced (2) peeling (2) poor (5) pricey (2) problem (19) rude (7) shabby (4) shock (2) slow (10) smell (7) smelly (2) stained (2) terrible (9) tiny (8) unclean (3) uncomfortable (9) unfortunate (4) unhelpful (3) worn (11) worst (9) wrong (4)

Tiny	Appears in 13 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Tiny:
bed (2) drink (2) fridge (3) friendly (2) good (2) hotel (5) kitchen (4) kitchenette (2) lobby (2) nice (2) not (3) old (2) plus (2) room (8) suite (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. In our first room we had there were 2 tiny little single beds and the comforters were very dusty and then to make matters worse we had what they call (water Beatles) running around the floor.

"Very disappointed! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2012 Vote

2. Each and everyone was polite and helpful and our room was really good with a tiny kitchenette (but this was enough and suited our needs).

"Bedford Hotel NYC - Recommended " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/26/2011 Vote

3. Friends we met up with paid for a new modern 4 star hotel & said their room was tiny & only had a walk in shower.

"Great Hotel, excellent value for money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/29/2010 Vote

4. Our room was tiny (as expected), sad and old.

"Not great, but nothing horrible either " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/7/2010 Vote

5. We had 4 adults sharing a 'One Bedroom Suite' which had a King bed plus two fold-outs in the living room, plus a tiny kitchenette (really only a fridge, stove-top, and sink).

"A rare bargain in Manhattan lodgings; excellent value. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/13/2009 Vote

6. The tiny kitchen had a fridge and a stove top.

"satisfactory hotel on the East Side " Read full review on Expedia 11/7/2007 Vote

7. The bathroom was also tiny but adequate.

"Hotel disappointing but good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/26/2007 Vote

8. The room was not refurbished as Sheeyla from Northamptonshire got and our room was tiny, very old and worn, a fridge and microwave and coffee maker but certainly no kitchen.

"Hotel disappointing but good location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/26/2007 Vote

9. tiny little galley 'kitchen'.

"Bedford Hotel was fine " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/26/2005 Vote

10. The tiny hotel lobby is nice, however, it is not wheelchair friendly as there are a half dozen stairs leading down to hotel lobby and that is the only access.

"Bedford Hotel was fine " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/26/2005 Vote