Ocean Park Motel, San Francisco, Noise

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Ocean Park Motel

OpinionWell
Rank

141st

Out of 493

Ocean Park Motel	Average Daily Rate: NA Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2690 46th Avenue

San Francisco, 94116 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 65 of 110
Average review rating: 4.47

OpinionWell Value Index: NA

Traveler reviews analyzed: TripAdvisor (103) , YahooTravel (5)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (4) bargain (1) bath (2) bathroom (28) beach (47) bed (18) breakfast (20) cable (1) charge (3) check in (7) check out (1) closet (7) cost (5) deal (5) decor (4) dinner (9) discount (3) downtown (24) food (3) front desk (1) highway (6) hot tub (13) hotel (36) housekeeping (2) landscape (1) location (32) lunch (6) money (4) neighborhood (9) ocean (78) parking (33) pillow (2) price (14) rate (1) recommend (12) restaurant (14) room (130) service (7) shower (8) shuttle (3) staff (17) street (26) suite (20) to park (2) towel (2) tub (2) value (8) walk (19) walk-in (2) wireless (13)

Noise

Appears in 18 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Noise:
car (2) earplugs (3) hotel (2) metro (2) much (3) night (3) not (2) quiet (2) reviews (2) room (7) sleep (2) street (5) train (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The owner warned me about the noise from the streetcar but I didn't really mind it very much.

"I loved this place " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/19/2012 Vote

2. The streetcar noise was worse than in their room so they did take advantage of the free earplugs.

"Not Exactly What I Expected " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/30/2012 Vote

3. Other people mentioned it was quiet and there isn't a lot of city noise or lots of people around.

"Not Exactly What I Expected " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/30/2012 Vote

4. Not everyone minds this (I actually liked the noise and considered it part of the ambience), but just in case ear plugs are provided in the rooms.

"Great art deco beach getaway! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/25/2012 Vote

5. It is near a muni turnaround so there is a little noise from the trains and you can hear the ocean waves.

"Great art deco beach getaway! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/25/2012 Vote

6. The only reason I can't give it a 5 is the noise.

"Great art deco beach getaway! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/25/2012 Vote

7. You need earplugs for traffic noise.

"OK if you have dogs or are going to the beach " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/18/2011 Vote

8. I stayed on a street room and the upside was you are right nest to metro and the down side is you are right next to metro , the train is SUPER loud I can sleep through anything but if your bothered by noise don't stay in their street rooms .

"Great location but really noisy " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/23/2011 Vote

9. Do ask for a quieter room if noise is a bother as muni rattles and screeches around the corner regularly from early morn to late at night.

"Start your day with a walk at the edge of the ocean " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/22/2011 Vote

10. Some people here mentioned noise from the street car outside, we hardly heard anything even though it was close (and great for a direct trip to downtown).

"A peaceful little motel island in the city " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/4/2011 Vote