Hotel Madera - a Kimpton Hotel, Washington DC, Friendly

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Hotel Madera - a Kimpton Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

29th

Out of 279

Hotel Madera - a Kimpton Hotel	Average Price: $331 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1310 New Hampshire Avenue NorthWest

Washington DC, 20036 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 9 of 30
Average review rating: 4.26

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (38) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (338) , YahooTravel (12)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (11) attentive (12) beautiful (17) best (33) better (20) big (46) cares (36) clean (106) comfortable (119) comfy (30) convenient (36) cool (16) courteous (14) cozy (10) delicious (16) efficient (12) enjoyable (10) excellent (46) exceptional (15) fabulous (9) fantastic (21) fast (11) free (108) fresh (13) friendly (174) fun (23) good (122) great (285) happy (18) helpful (136) huge (28) impressed (12) liked (121) love (55) new (34) nice (193) perfect (41) pleasant (22) plenty (22) positive (17) professional (12) quiet (61) reasonable (22) reasonably (9) spacious (63) stylish (9) tasteful (13) terrific (10) welcoming (56) wonderful (39)

Friendly

Appears in 214 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Friendly:
accommodating (8) car (8) clean (10) comfortable (10) desk (20) dog (12) extremely (10) great (14) helpful (54) hotel (50) liked (10) location (15) nice (11) not (21) recommend (12) room (38) service (20) staff (104) welcoming (12) well (9)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Room service was affordable, efficient and delicious, and without exception the staff was friendly and eager to help, even with special requests.

"Treated like royalty " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/8/2012 Vote

2. very friendly staff.

"Rock solid - only problem is parking is a hassle " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

3. The wife was out of town - my friend flew in and we needed a place to crash in DC for a baseball game.

"Rock solid - only problem is parking is a hassle " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

4. Staff was very friendly and very helpful.

"Comfortable room, great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

5. The staff were friendly and competent, the room was spacious and modern, great location just off Dupont Circle.

"A pleasant surprise " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2012 Vote

6. friendly.

"Extraordinary Service -- Great Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/2/2012 Vote

7. We enjoyed the Firefly for breakfast, friendly and efficient waitstaff.

"Love Kimpton Hotels! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2012 Vote

8. It's much more like walking into the entrance hall of a close friend's house the way they welcome you in and pour wine during wine hour.

"Great Boutique Hotel Getting Even Better " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/16/2012 Vote

9. -area friends that they dine there soon.

"Excellent care for guests " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

10. How did they know I like to do 15 miles on the bike now and then? :) The service staff were very friendly and responsive to questions; my request for a quiet room was taken seriously, and the room fit the bill.

"Excellent despite renovation, that says something " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/28/2012 Vote