Imperial Palace Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Plenty

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Imperial Palace Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

74th

Out of 481

Imperial Palace Las Vegas	Average Price: $72 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3535 Las Vegas Boulevard South

Las Vegas, 89109 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 27 of 92
Average review rating: 3.1

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (7) , Expedia (110) , MyTravelGuide (462) , Travelocity (269) , TripAdvisor (3148) , YahooTravel (231)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (4/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	Recent comments complained about bed bugs.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (49) adequate (78) affordable (73) awesome (126) beautiful (37) best (467) better (520) big (268) cares (180) cheaper (94) cheapest (72) clean (1843) comfortable (448) comfy (89) convenient (112) cool (63) courteous (45) decent (180) excellent (246) exceptional (103) fabulous (42) fancy (173) fantastic (119) fast (114) free (393) fresh (86) friendly (734) fun (431) generous (43) good (1686) great (1736) happy (129) helpful (478) huge (197) liked (1022) love (214) new (292) newer (52) nice (837) perfect (218) perfectly (43) pleasant (106) pleased (40) plenty (132) positive (81) quiet (282) reasonable (213) reasonably (46) spacious (82) wonderful (102)

Plenty

Appears in 186 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Plenty:
bathroom (14) chair (13) clean (43) drink (11) eat (13) elevator (11) food (14) good (14) great (12) hot (13) hotel (29) need (11) nice (14) not (13) pool (24) room (58) service (11) towel (45) walking (10) water (19)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It was plenty hot (99), the sun was shining and the mountain views were beautiful.

"Location, Location, Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

2. clean, plenty of chairs, water was heated.

"Wonderful staff, Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

3. The casino isn't as big as some of the others, but has plenty of games and the dealertainers were amusing at times.

"Great location, nice clean room, great value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2012 Vote

4. Nothing special but there appeared to be plenty of lounge chairs.

"Great location, nice clean room, great value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2012 Vote

5. The casino is laid out very well and plenty of wait staff to keep the cocktails flowing.

"Great Hotel in Super Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/29/2012 Vote

6. The location of the hotel on the other hand is excellent, right in the middle of all the best hotels and plenty of places to eat and drink nearby.

"Poor hotel, great location, decent value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

7. plenty if free garage parking.

"Best price value on the strip! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/7/2012 Vote

8. Right across from the Mirage, so there's plenty within walking distance.

"Economical Value in Priceless Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/29/2012 Vote

9. Very friendly staff and plenty of places to dine at reasonable rates.

"Short break in Las Vegas " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/20/2012 Vote

10. The rooms are cleaned every day & they really do do a good job in keeping the place clean, there are plenty of food courts in the hotel & a small shopping arcade & of course the casino which is 24/7.

"Great value hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/16/2012 Vote