Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Imperial Palace Las Vegas
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
74th
Out of 481

Imperial Palace Las Vegas

Average Price: $72  
 
Hotel Class:
3535 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, 89109 View map  
3-Star Hotel Rank: 27 of 92
Average review rating: 3.1
OpinionWell Value Index: 6
Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (7) , Expedia (110) , MyTravelGuide (462) , Travelocity (269) , TripAdvisor (3148) , YahooTravel (231)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (4/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Newer
Appears in 70 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Newer:
bed (5)   better (5)   friendly (5)   great (6)   hotel (45)   liked (4)   location (8)   luxurious (4)   most (3)   much (5)   nice (6)   nicer (5)   night (3)   not (17)   old (4)   price (8)   room (19)   spacious (3)   staff (3)   upgraded (3)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
See all
1. We could have stayed at the Westin which is newer hotel, on Flamingo, and just 1.
"Believe the poor reviews! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   5/10/2012 Vote      
2. Sure we were glad to spend the rest of our stay in a newer room.
"Great location - terrible quality " Read full review on TripAdvisor   4/8/2012 Vote      
3. Not on the same scale as the newer hotels like the Venetian or Wyn's etc.
"not up tp par - needs improvement " Read full review on TripAdvisor   4/3/2012 Vote      
4. newer hotels in Vegas may have fancier rooms, but none have the overall experience of Imperial Palace - great location center-strip, friendly staff, nice accommodations, reasonable prices, fun and vibrant casino.
"Great value and location " Read full review on TripAdvisor   3/11/2012 Vote      
5. We stayed in the Deluxe tower, which is supposedly newer.
"Great value on a Budget " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/12/2012 Vote      
6. The carpet was old but not stained, the beds looked newer and each bed had 4 nice pillows on it.
"Adequate! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   1/3/2012 Vote      
7. The next day I went to look at the original room type that I requested (tower 2 also), and it looked exactly the same (actually a little smaller with newer looking lamps).
"Pleasantly surprised! " Read full review on TripAdvisor   12/20/2011 Vote      
8. Also, the casino floor was often very crowded, as it is not equipped to hold as many people as some of the newer casinos.
"Great Location, Great Price " Read full review on TripAdvisor   11/29/2011 Vote      
9. The casino was bright and I did not find it smoky (I found Planet Hollywood and The Mirage very smoky), with newer slot machines.
"Great stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor   10/31/2011 Vote      
10. Otherwise stay somewhere else newer or go to another hotel's pool party.
"Cheap, bad water pressure, horrible elevators, but great location. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   9/12/2011 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
Tools for hotel professionals
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved