Wynn Hotel Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Lack

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Wynn Hotel Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

2nd

Out of 481

Wynn Hotel Las Vegas	Average Price: $317 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3131 Las Vegas Boulevard South

Las Vegas, 89109 View map

5-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 17
Average review rating: 4.11

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (18) , Expedia (129) , MyTravelGuide (66) , Travelocity (54) , TripAdvisor (3748) , YahooTravel (193)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (72) avoid (95) awful (49) bad (304) bed bugs (26) big deal (34) chipped (36) complain (170) complaint (152) crap (62) difficult (62) dirty (53) disappoint (345) disturbing (27) downside (60) expensive (561) frustrated (28) hard (178) hassle (26) hate (34) horrible (67) inconvenient (27) issue (228) lack (84) loud (149) mediocre (25) mess (27) mistake (52) negative (136) noise (383) noisy (71) outrageous (40) overpriced (93) poor (117) pricey (196) problem (408) ridiculous (68) rock (55) rude (134) shame (31) shock (44) slow (111) smell (152) tacky (51) terrible (70) unacceptable (27) unfortunate (106) unfriendly (29) worst (68) wrong (123)

Lack	Appears in 181 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Lack:
atmosphere (7) attentive (8) beauty (8) coffee (8) customer (8) great (9) guest (9) hotel (54) lacking (183) liked (13) nice (18) not (20) pool (11) problem (8) resort (8) reviews (7) room (49) service (38) staff (13) view (8)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. My only gripe with Wynn - the Concierge service was lacking.

"Treated Like a Queen " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

2. I was also disappointed in the lack of wifi or free wifi in the convention part.

"Not bad for a Casino hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/5/2012 Vote

3. Hotel is beautiful but they are lacking in customer service.

"Poor Customer Service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/4/2012 Vote

4. One negative is the lack of vending machines.

"You get what you pay for...luckily " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2012 Vote

5. It's service is outstanding, and it is warm and friendly, lacking in pretense.

"A fabulous place to spend a few days " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

6. I'm sure it's not their fault - as everyone else is probably in the same boat with lack of game development.

"Best Experience at the Wynn yet! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/12/2012 Vote

7. The main gripes we had in no particular order are; noise from neighboring rooms, the mini bar restocking fee, the pool beds reserved for Cabana's and the lack of a trendy cocktail lounge after the closure of Blush.

"Best Hotel in Vegas, but not true 5 star luxury " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/10/2012 Vote

8. Everyone was very skilled and had mastered some amazing techniques, but the lack of plot in those types of shows does make the routines a little bit tedious and repetitive.

"Vegans in Vegas " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/8/2012 Vote

9. The room was beautiful with a great view, but cleanliness was lacking.

"Great Location, Food, & Amenities " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2012 Vote

10. The only drawback is the lack of a coffee maker in the room and room service is expensive.

"Great Stay in Vegas " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/20/2012 Vote