Cova Hotel, San Francisco, Nasty

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Cova Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

41st

Out of 493

Cova Hotel	Average Price: $172 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

655 Ellis Street

San Francisco, 94109 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 119
Average review rating: 3.83

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (26) , Travelocity (1) , TripAdvisor (214)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (4) avoid (25) awful (3) bad (24) broken (2) complain (5) complaint (2) confront (1) damage (1) dangerous (9) difficult (2) disappoint (5) disturbing (3) downside (10) dump (2) expensive (6) hard (13) hassle (3) inconvenient (2) issue (16) lack (5) loud (2) mistake (4) nasty (1) negative (6) noise (6) noisy (5) poor (4) poorly (3) problem (40) rough (5) rude (6) scary (7) shabby (2) shame (4) slow (7) smell (6) stained (1) stink (1) tacky (2) terrible (6) uncomfortable (7) unfortunate (5) unhelpful (4) unpleasant (4) unsafe (12) urine (2) weird (2) worst (11) wrong (4)

Nasty

Appears in 1 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Nasty:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. The carpet was nasty and stained in the hallways.

"Mixed review, please read below. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/24/2012 Vote