OpinionWell's Blog
Home
»
United States
»
California
»
San Francisco Destinations
»
San Francisco Hotels
»
Hotel Beresford
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
114th
Out of 493
Hotel Beresford
Average Price: $126
Check Rates
Hotel Class:
635 Sutter Street
San Francisco, 94102
View map
2-Star Hotel Rank:
22 of 119
Average review rating:
3.56
OpinionWell Value Index:
2
Traveler reviews analyzed:
Expedia
(
40
)
,
Travelocity
(
4
)
,
TripAdvisor
(
172
)
,
YahooTravel
(
10
)
SAFE TO BOOK ?
(1/5 issues found)
Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:
Construction:
No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:
Recent comments
complained about noise.
Room Smell:
No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:
No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:
No recent comments about bed bugs were found.
Search reviews for other problems
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
All
Positive
Negative
Keyword Search
a little on the small side
(1)
bad
(11)
big problem
(2)
broken
(2)
claustrophobic
(1)
complain
(3)
complaint
(2)
cramped
(4)
dated
(1)
dirty
(4)
disappoint
(6)
disgust
(2)
downside
(3)
expensive
(5)
hard
(7)
hardly
(3)
issue
(6)
lack
(4)
loud
(6)
negative
(2)
noise
(18)
noisy
(15)
outdated
(3)
overcharged
(1)
overpriced
(1)
poor
(7)
pretentious
(1)
problem
(22)
rock
(1)
rude
(6)
scary
(2)
slow
(2)
smell
(10)
smoker
(2)
stained
(1)
stale
(2)
stink
(1)
stunk
(1)
tiny
(9)
too small
(1)
ugly
(3)
unbearable
(1)
unfortunate
(6)
unfriendly
(1)
unpleasant
(1)
was a joke
(1)
weird
(1)
worn
(4)
worst
(3)
wrong
(3)
See more
Lack
Appears in 6 comments.
The following words were used in comments with
Lack:
breakfast
(3)
lacking
(7)
problem
(2)
room
(2)
tiny
(2)
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the
Most helpful
section.
Sort by:
Date
Votes
1.
One problem is the WIFI or
lack
therefore.
"Cute Little Boutique Hotel "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
1/25/2011
Vote
2.
The reason I say this is good for a short stay is because of the tiny bedrooms, the
lack
of a decent breakfast and the
lack
of amenities at the hotel.
"Good hotel for a short stay "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
11/17/2010
Vote
3.
The only negative point for me was that breakfast was a bit
lack
ing.
"Would Return without Hesitation "
Read full review
on
Expedia
1/14/2009
Vote
4.
Traveling in March, I did not notice any problems with the
lack
of A/C in the building.
"Great Deal for simple and charming experience "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
10/9/2008
Vote
5.
The rooms are tiny and
lack
air conditioning.
"Convenient location "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
10/14/2007
Vote
6.
One issue that needs sorting, ventilation or
lack
off in resturant/breakfast room.
"Quaint and Great "
Read full review
on
TripAdvisor
8/14/2007
Vote
About Us
|
Terms of Use
|
Privacy Policy
|
Site Map
Tools for hotel professionals
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved