Palms Place Hotel Spa, Las Vegas, Bed

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Palms Place Hotel Spa

OpinionWell
Rank

51st

Out of 481

Palms Place Hotel Spa	Average Price: $247 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

4381 West Flamingo Road

Las Vegas, 89104 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 19 of 28
Average review rating: 4.47

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (34) , Travelocity (5) , TripAdvisor (321) , YahooTravel (3)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (24) balcony (124) bar (89) bath (42) bathroom (159) bathtub (21) bed (108) bill (14) breakfast (39) cabana (25) charge (31) check in (76) check out (14) concierge (30) cost (24) deal (46) decor (22) dinner (21) fee (43) food (83) front desk (86) gym (21) hotel (580) housekeeping (56) lobby (59) location (63) manager (33) massage (14) money (32) parking (21) pillow (17) pool (217) price (55) rate (39) recommend (54) restaurant (97) room (831) room service (47) service (138) shower (113) shuttle (27) spa (87) staff (166) suite (222) towel (25) tub (75) valet (27) value (26) view (194) walk (98)

Bed	Appears in 108 comments. 94% wrote positive comments about bed

The following words were used in comments with Bed:
comfortable (44) comfy (9) floor (10) great (15) hotel (8) kitchen (16) large (8) nice (12)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The bed is a nice size, albeit close to the floor.

"A dirty hip version of THE Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

2. good in size, comfortable bed, great shower.

"Sewer Room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

3. Bed was king size and extremely comfortable.

"Palms Place Hotel & Spa, Las Vegas, NV " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/12/2012 Vote

4. Kitchenette with mini bar, small fridge, dishwasher, ice maker, there are two TV's in the main room, sectional sofa and chair, balcony, a TV in the bathroom, comfy bed.

"BEAUTIFUL rooms but resort has a "dark" feeling " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/26/2012 Vote

5. As for sleeping arrangements, there was a comfortable king sized bed as well as a pull-out full/queen sized couch bed.

"Great hotel, lacking location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/23/2012 Vote

6. Also, though, the cupboards come stocked with plates, cups, silverware, etc. The bathroom is also nice, the bed is comfy, and it has 3 plasma TV's including two that are roughly 50'.

"Palms Place is First Class all the way! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/18/2012 Vote

7. the bed was So comfy and there were 3 TV's in the room.

"Modern and Comfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

8. Having said that, the suite was clean and spacious, the bed was comfortable, and the full size refrigerator came in very handy when I picked up a bottle of wine and brought home some leftover.

"Awesome place, except for the gym fee. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/24/2012 Vote

9. The 1 bedroom suite is superb, nice comfy bed, awesome kitchen with all the amenities in place, the panorama strip view is just so priceless.

"Best Hotel Stay in Vegas Hip and Excellent Service! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/24/2012 Vote

10. The room was freshened up when we were out and it was very comfortable, although my husband thought the bed was a bit soft.

"Palms Perfect!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/16/2012 Vote