Crowne Plaza Union Square, San Francisco, Rate

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Francisco Destinations » San Francisco Hotels » Crowne Plaza Union Square

OpinionWell
Rank

86th

Out of 493

Crowne Plaza Union Square	Average Price: $251 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

480 Sutter Street

San Francisco, 94108 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 31 of 37
Average review rating: 4

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (30) , MyTravelGuide (532) , Travelocity (13) , TripAdvisor (392) , YahooTravel (16)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (14) bar (59) bath (16) bathroom (91) bed (69) bill (7) breakfast (73) charge (12) check in (52) check out (11) closet (13) concierge (55) cost (24) deal (20) decor (12) dinner (17) downtown (26) fee (14) fitness room (8) food (42) front desk (74) gym (10) hotel (604) housekeeping (14) lobby (60) location (285) lunch (10) manager (11) money (15) parking (67) pillow (18) price (40) rate (34) recommend (55) restaurant (96) room (527) room service (20) service (99) shower (28) staff (193) street (108) suite (27) towel (10) tub (7) valet (14) valet parking (8) value (12) view (107) walk (79) wireless (27)

Rate	Appears in 34 comments. 100% wrote positive comments about rate

The following words were used in comments with Rate:
comfortable (3) good (5) hotel (8) internet (2) night (6) reasonable (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The hotel was quiet and we received a really good rate for our large and comfortable room with a view of Union Square.

"Great Value and Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/18/2011 Vote

2. I think we probably one of the minimum rooms as we had a very good rate for the special group event we were attending but it was still very new, modern & comfortable.

"This is a great location, a block from Union Sq. and the Powell St cable car is on the corner. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/30/2010 Vote

3. Stayed because it's a Marriott (I'm a Rewards member) and they had a decent AAA rate.

"Great Hotel, Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/14/2010 Vote

4. Stayed because it's a Marriott (I'm a Rewards member) and they had a decent AAA rate.

"Great Hotel, Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/14/2010 Vote

5. Got great rate for location.

"Great Location for the money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/13/2009 Vote

6. ) We happened upon an amazing AAA rate online while browsing for hotels, made a few extra requests (they couldn't guarantee) like early check-in, extra pillows.

"As close to a perfect place to stay as we can imagine! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/26/2009 Vote

7. I was able to get a very nice rate indeed.

"Hotel 480 (becoming Marriott) " Read full review on Expedia 4/8/2009 Vote

8. There is still renovations going on in the lobby and exterior, probably the reason for the low room rate.

"BEST VALUE EVER! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2009 Vote

9. com, travelocity, etc. for a reasonable rate-- I was happy to get it for $110 a night, but feel it's worth at least $200-$250.

"An absolute gem! It is now on my favorite list. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2009 Vote

10. Location was very convenient to the Union Square / Powell street shopping, Very good rate through Travelocity.

"Nice Room, Friendly Staff, Great Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/16/2008 Vote