Marriott Wardman Park, Washington DC, Charge

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Marriott Wardman Park

OpinionWell
Rank

48th

Out of 279

Marriott Wardman Park	Average Price: $381 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2660 Woodley Road, NorthWest

Washington DC, 20008 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 23 of 58
Average review rating: 3.62

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (14) , Expedia (30) , Travelocity (8) , TripAdvisor (519) , YahooTravel (27)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (30) bar (81) bath (15) bathroom (126) bed (107) bill (16) breakfast (95) charge (44) check in (65) closet (21) concierge (57) cost (27) deal (40) dinner (32) downtown (34) fee (14) fitness center (34) food (113) front desk (133) gym (30) hotel (1258) housekeeping (30) landscape (19) lobby (128) location (264) manager (26) money (24) neighborhood (49) parking (104) pillow (31) pool (87) price (89) rate (71) recommend (44) restaurant (312) room (1024) room service (45) service (168) sheets (26) shower (52) staff (225) street (106) suite (48) towel (41) valet (25) valet parking (19) value (19) view (51) walk (178) wireless (53)

Charge

Appears in 44 comments.

28% wrote positive comments about charge

The following words were used in comments with Charge:
complimentary (3) double (3) expense (3) extra (5) free (9) hotel (12) internet (15) lobby (3) night (3) slow (3) valet (3) wireless (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Complimentary Wi-Fi would have been a nice touch (I think they charge somewhere around $12/day for in-room internet).

"Won on Priceline... good value for money " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/18/2010 Vote

2. The front desk was very quick to take care of the double charge for valet and self park and they were able to split our bill on check out.

"Marriott Wardman Park Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/17/2009 Vote

3. I don't think that it would be worth the $30 they charge of the buffet, but for free, I can't complain.

"Washington Marriott Wardman Park " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/1/2009 Vote

4. We somehow lucked out, and having booked a standard room, were upgraded to a 'presidential suite' free of charge.

"Mixed Bag " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/21/2007 Vote

5. And do not have UPS ship anything to have held in their mail room until you pick it up along with a gratuitous charge of $50.

"Great hotel with many perks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2012 Vote

6. They charge $10/day and the service is unusable.

"Average " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

7. 00 per night, free WIFI in the lobby but an extra charge in the rooms.

"A little pricey but good service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/11/2012 Vote

8. Con: 22% tip (service charge) plus a delivery charge ($4.00).

"Really, I have to pay for internet access on EACH of my devices? " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/6/2012 Vote

9. My dinner for one without alcohol came to $79.05 because the high price of the meal, and tack on top of that the service and delivery charge.

"Really, I have to pay for internet access on EACH of my devices? " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/6/2012 Vote

10. Have them double charge us on multiple occasions.

"Consistently poor service and disorganized staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/26/2011 Vote