James Hotel Chicago, Chicago, Bathroom

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » James Hotel Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

7th

Out of 415

James Hotel Chicago	Average Price: $282 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

55 East Ontario

Chicago, 60611 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 3 of 39
Average review rating: 4.23

OpinionWell Value Index: 7

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (37) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (655) , YahooTravel (30)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (56) bar (213) bath (52) bathroom (222) bed (231) breakfast (117) charge (27) check in (92) check out (38) closet (33) complimentary (61) concierge (136) cost (31) deal (58) decor (68) dinner (60) downtown (54) food (82) front desk (111) gym (87) hotel (1234) housekeeping (39) lobby (129) location (451) lunch (17) manager (23) massage (21) mini bar (22) money (32) parking (33) pillow (40) price (81) rate (91) recommend (106) restaurant (283) room (1149) room service (75) service (380) shower (63) spa (58) staff (471) street (134) suite (130) towel (42) tub (22) valet (25) value (44) view (88) walk (101) wireless (44)

Bathroom

Appears in 222 comments.

66% wrote positive comments about bathroom

The following words were used in comments with Bathroom:
clean (26) closet (12) comfortable (25) good (18) great (25) hotel (32) large (18) lighting (12) modern (12) nice (43) spacious (12) well (15)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. We were upgraded to a one bed apartment which was really spacious - living/dining/bar area plus separate king bedroom & lovely bathroom.

"Really great city centre hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/20/2012 Vote

2. The bathroom was nice and modern.

"Cool Hotel in great area of Chicago " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

3. The room was beautiful & luxurious, it had a large bathroom, the most comfortable bed I have ever slept in.

"Loved it!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2012 Vote

4. The bathroom was lovely and functional (plenty of counter space).

"Impressed with service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/17/2012 Vote

5. There was plenty of bathroom counter space.

"Perfect, Or As Close As You'll Ever Get " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

6. The bathroom was good as well.

"Great location, great room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/30/2012 Vote

7. Comfortable beds but bathroom layout with sliding door is a bit odd.

"Can't beat the location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2012 Vote

8. The bathroom is nice and the provided hotel hair dryer, soaps etc worked well for our needs.

"Amazing Place to Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/16/2012 Vote

9. The overall decor was excellent, very neutral and cool; the bathroom was clean and nicely fitted out; the wet bar was an excellent touch - it's great to be able to fix a drink without needing to use the bathroom sink!; 2 TVs and a B&W Zeppelin iPod dock kept my entertainment needs in check; lots of big mirrors made it feel even bigger and less hotel-y and , the killer thing.

"Better than I expected, and I expected good...! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/13/2012 Vote

10. The first room we were allocated was a double room with a very comfortable bed, nice bathroom, very clean & plenty of room.

"A clean stylish hotel in a convenient location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2012 Vote