Park Manor Suites, San Diego, Exceptional

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Diego Destinations » San Diego Hotels » Park Manor Suites

OpinionWell
Rank

65th

Out of 517

Park Manor Suites	Average Price: $174 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

525 Spruce

San Diego, 92103 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 32 of 101
Average review rating: 3.82

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (3) , Expedia (38) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (175) , YahooTravel (18)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (6) affordable (4) amazing (7) attentive (3) beautiful (16) best (24) better (10) big (25) cares (6) clean (45) comfortable (61) convenient (22) cool (6) courteous (4) decent (5) excellent (29) exceptional (14) fabulous (5) fancy (3) fantastic (8) free (44) fresh (21) friendly (67) fun (12) generous (6) good (75) great (137) happy (20) helpful (49) huge (21) liked (43) love (11) new (25) nice (78) panoramic (3) perfect (15) perfectly (4) pleasant (12) pleased (6) plenty (12) positive (3) professional (8) quiet (16) reasonable (15) responsive (4) roomy (6) spacious (24) spectacular (4) welcoming (8) wonderful (31)

Exceptional

Appears in 18 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Exceptional:
area (2) breakfast (2) ceiling (2) does (2) excellent (2) fan (3) food (2) great (3) hotel (6) nice (2) night (4) not (4) park (5) room (5) staff (2) table (2) useful (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. All tolerable except for the fact that the second morning of our stay - when we were finally allowed to eat breakfast on the rooftop, we were told that we had to join others at tables for 6 (only 4 were set up) or cram the 3 of us onto a tiny elevated cocktail table.

"Beware of remodeling " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/12/2012 Vote

2. WiFi was nonexistent, except in the lobby and restaurant areas.

"My affection for this place is guarded " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/23/2012 Vote

3. For being a littl worn, the room was really clean with one exception, the ceiling fan is caked with dirt.

"A weekend at Grandmas apartment " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/15/2011 Vote

4. Rooms were very large except for a small galley kitchen.

"Needs renovation but loved it anyway! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/1/2011 Vote

5. There is no pool or public area to use except a smoking patio downstairs.

"Nice Location - Amateurish Staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/22/2011 Vote

6. We have stayed here before and were pleased, except this time.

"What happened to the Park Manor " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2010 Vote

7. Great views and exceptional food.

"Step back in time! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2010 Vote

8. Great food, with my partner and our friend having the 'Cheif's Whim' - that turned out to be an exceptional pork loin special that was not to have been missed.

"Step back in time! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/3/2010 Vote

9. The hotel has a parking lot that you can use for free which was nice except that it fills up quickly.

"Funky old hotel with huge rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/22/2009 Vote

10. PARKING: Parking was included and we were always able to find a spot except for one night when my sister had to park on the street half a block away.

"can't beat the location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/26/2009 Vote