Millennium Hotel Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Friendly

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Ohio » Cincinnati Destinations » Cincinnati Hotels » Millennium Hotel Cincinnati

OpinionWell
Rank

8th

Out of 150

Millennium Hotel Cincinnati	Average Price: $165 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

150 West 5th Street

Cincinnati, 45202-2393 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 28
Average review rating: 3

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (10) , Expedia (85) , MyTravelGuide (617) , TripAdvisor (360) , YahooTravel (40)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (14) accommodating (9) adequate (9) awesome (12) beautiful (6) best (19) better (35) big (22) cares (21) cheaper (16) clean (186) cleanliness (9) comfortable (68) comfy (8) convenient (30) cool (9) correct (5) courteous (8) decent (27) excellent (27) exceptional (15) fabulous (6) fantastic (6) fast (12) free (58) fresh (7) friendly (85) good (159) great (168) happy (20) helpful (84) huge (15) impressed (6) liked (94) new (26) newer (6) nice (199) perfect (13) perfectly (9) pleasant (17) pleased (7) plenty (14) positive (15) professional (8) quiet (17) reasonable (21) soft (5) spacious (10) welcoming (5) wonderful (17)

Friendly

Appears in 269 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Friendly:
bed (10) clean (35) desk (26) extremely (10) families (11) good (14) great (16) helpful (78) hotel (57) liked (8) lobby (7) location (18) nice (20) not (21) park (9) recommend (10) room (49) service (15) small (7) staff (172)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The friendliness of the staff was hit-or-miss, but the friendly ones more than made up for the less outgoing ones.

"Good location, mediocre hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/20/2012 Vote

2. Service friendly, but check-in took a while.

"Don't pay full price. Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/11/2012 Vote

3. The staff was friendly, more than happy to provide recommendations regarding local eating establishments.

"Flying Pig Weekend Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2012 Vote

4. Now the positives: Great location, friendly staff, nice furniture in the room, nicely decorated, comfy bed, pretty clean, excellent views from the south tower.

"Overall a decent downtown hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

5. I hope my fellow trip advior friends will trust me along with others who may just be browsing the site.

"THIS GLASS IS HALF EMPTY FOR SURE!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/9/2012 Vote

6. no wheelchair for my friend,We found out very quickly that there were 'groups' of people there.

"Terrible experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/1/2012 Vote

7. we had to use the valet parking for my friend, who is handicapped, but were forced to walk clear to the other side of the hotel to check in.

"Terrible experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/1/2012 Vote

8. We came to Cincinnati with friends to see a show and spend the evening.

"Terrible experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/1/2012 Vote

9. Staff - takes a long time to ask a question, not efficient in handlng, not friendly, not helpful.

"Need overall update " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

10. Won't make that mstake again -- more like a dirty Ramada without the friendly staff.

"Calling Dr. Kevorkian " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/19/2012 Vote