Millennium Hotel Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Fast

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Ohio » Cincinnati Destinations » Cincinnati Hotels » Millennium Hotel Cincinnati

OpinionWell
Rank

8th

Out of 150

Millennium Hotel Cincinnati	Average Price: $165 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

150 West 5th Street

Cincinnati, 45202-2393 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 28
Average review rating: 3

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (10) , Expedia (85) , MyTravelGuide (617) , TripAdvisor (360) , YahooTravel (40)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (14) accommodating (9) adequate (9) awesome (12) beautiful (6) best (19) better (35) big (22) cares (21) cheaper (16) clean (186) cleanliness (9) comfortable (68) comfy (8) convenient (30) cool (9) correct (5) courteous (8) decent (27) excellent (27) exceptional (15) fabulous (6) fantastic (6) fast (12) free (58) fresh (7) friendly (85) good (159) great (168) happy (20) helpful (84) huge (15) impressed (6) liked (94) new (26) newer (6) nice (199) perfect (13) perfectly (9) pleasant (17) pleased (7) plenty (14) positive (15) professional (8) quiet (17) reasonable (21) soft (5) spacious (10) welcoming (5) wonderful (17)

Fast	Appears in 23 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Fast:
amazed (2) clean (2) convenient (2) easy (2) efficient (2) elevator (3) excellent (2) friendly (5) hotel (6) internet (3) location (2) nice (2) recommend (2) room (4) service (3) staff (5) value (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Needless to say we couldn't get out fast enough.

"So disgusting we had to leave " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

2. I arrive and pull up to the front and opt for the valet option because the guy talks so fast and I'm clueless as to what the options he's explaing are.

"do not stay here " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/12/2011 Vote

3. Internet is fast and fairly priced at $7.

"Clean, fast Internet, but barely warm hot water ! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/1/2011 Vote

4. The first time I stayed, I was very impressed, but each time after, I have become incredibly disappointed, as the hotel seems to be going down hill- fast.

"Each time I stay here, I become more disappointed " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/18/2011 Vote

5. The location does provide fast and easy access to the riverfront/stadiums and it's very convenient.

"A la carte everything - Panhandlers in lot " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2011 Vote

6. Very nice hotel staff, fast check-in and elevators, large, clean room, nice view, convenient downtown location, and an easy walk to the Great American Ball Park.

"Would stay again " Read full review on Expedia 9/21/2010 Vote

7. They get more reservations by saying they offer 'high speed internet access' regardless of how fast or reliable it really is.

"Didn't quite meet my expectations... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/4/2010 Vote

8. If you rely on a stable, fast internet connection for communication and work, or you want a really comfy bed, you might want to consider staying elsewhere.

"Didn't quite meet my expectations... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/4/2010 Vote

9. The check-in and check-out was fast and efficient.

"Great Hotel " Read full review on Expedia 10/2/2009 Vote

10. it came fast.

"Not a 3 1/2 or 4 star hotel " Read full review on Expedia 6/18/2009 Vote