The Palms Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Huge

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » The Palms Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

57th

Out of 481

The Palms Las Vegas	Average Price: $217 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

4321 West Flamingo Road

Las Vegas, 89103 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 21 of 28
Average review rating: 3.41

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (79) , MyTravelGuide (46) , Travelocity (30) , TripAdvisor (632) , YahooTravel (42)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (11) awesome (52) beautiful (50) best (99) better (111) big (51) cares (36) clean (207) comfortable (99) comfy (18) convenient (11) cool (49) correct (10) decent (47) excellent (72) exceptional (30) fabulous (22) fantastic (41) fast (22) free (168) fresh (10) friendly (175) fun (121) generous (17) good (353) gorgeous (15) great (410) happy (31) helpful (96) huge (57) liked (284) love (55) new (95) newer (19) nice (338) perfect (42) pleasant (19) plenty (24) positive (14) professional (19) prompt (12) quiet (33) reasonable (52) responsive (11) spacious (32) spectacular (16) superior (20) tasteful (13) welcoming (19) wonderful (37)

Huge	Appears in 84 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Huge:
amazed (5) bar (4) bathroom (17) bed (16) club (6) comfortable (10) floor (10) great (6) hotel (5) jacuzzi (8) large (4) nice (8) night (4) not (10) pool (6) room (37) size (5) suite (5) tub (10) view (10)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Room#`14-117 at the end of the short hallway was spotless,and the huge bathroom was a treat.

"It was great!. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/13/2012 Vote

2. The spa tub had a huge wad of black hair.

"Think twice before staying here " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2012 Vote

3. There were huge crowds waiting to get into the nightclubs and it was really hard to get to the elevators to go to our room.

"Not a family friendly hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/20/2012 Vote

4. PROS: Off strip so traffic isn't so crazy (this might be a negative for some who want to be on strip) Easy check-in: tons of staff at the huge front desk.

"Not a family friendly hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/20/2012 Vote

5. It was HUGE and I was unable to even dent it so I took it home.

"Guardino's at THE Palms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/9/2012 Vote

6. Every shopping area and casino is huge, so you're going to be doing a lot of walking in this town.

"Palms Place Hotel and Spa (NOT the casino)- Gorgeous, great value " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/23/2012 Vote

7. However, the beds were very good, and the bathroom was huge and marbled, and included a nice large jetted tub and was surrounded by frosted glass - so that was very nice.

"Decent hotel, but too much noise, smoke, and nickle and diming " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/21/2012 Vote

8. Two huge rooms, two TV's, two large bathrooms, and on the 26th floor with views of the Strip, the mountains and back to LA.

"Pleasantly surprised at the room and service! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/21/2012 Vote

9. Nice King bed with a HUGE bathroom.

"Always wanted to Stay- But will I stay again? " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/6/2012 Vote

10. The casino is not huge so it is easy to navigate.

"Great Hotel, Off Strip " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/5/2012 Vote