Hampton Inn Majestic Chicago, Chicago, Fancy

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Hampton Inn Majestic Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

34th

Out of 415

Hampton Inn Majestic Chicago	Average Price: $239 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

22 West Monroe Street

Chicago, 60603 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 12 of 73
Average review rating: 4.67

OpinionWell Value Index: 8

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (36) , Travelocity (12) , TripAdvisor (407) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (12) adequate (15) awesome (11) beautiful (25) best (51) better (35) big (45) cares (14) cheaper (12) clean (215) comfortable (164) comfy (27) convenient (70) courteous (18) cozy (11) decent (31) efficient (14) excellent (84) exceptional (12) fabulous (11) fancy (9) fantastic (25) fast (9) free (153) fresh (30) friendly (191) good (233) great (384) happy (15) helpful (194) huge (18) impressed (19) liked (100) love (27) magnificent (22) new (26) nice (211) outstanding (11) perfect (71) pleasant (27) pleased (16) plenty (31) quiet (82) reasonable (25) reasonably (14) soft (17) spacious (42) terrific (9) welcoming (18) wonderful (53)

Fancy

Appears in 10 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Fancy:
big (3) clean (3) comfortable (2) food (2) great (4) hotel (5) lobby (3) location (2) nice (4) not (3) room (3)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

1. nothing fancy but super clean, comfortable, and nice.

"Neat Hotel in Downtown Chicago. Check it out! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/2/2011 Vote

2. If you are looking for a hotel with a big fancy lobby this isn't it, however if you want a nice clean room in a great location this is the spot for you.

"Very pleased with our stay here " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/2/2010 Vote

3. If you are looking for a hotel with a big fancy lobby this isn't it, however if you want a nice clean room in a great location this is the spot for you.

"Very pleased with our stay here " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/2/2010 Vote

4. Tons of resuarants, from fast food to fancy, within a few minutes' walk.

"Outstanding " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/17/2010 Vote

5. This is obviously not a 'fancy' hotel but when asked at checkout for any complaints or anything they could improve on, I really couldn't come up with anything - and that's a 1st for me.

"Great Value, Good Service, Convenient Location & Free Breakfast! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/25/2010 Vote

6. The breakfast was nice,nothing fancy but you can definitely get full easily.

"I loved our stay at this hotel! The location was awesome! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/15/2009 Vote

7. If you're looking for a room with great views of the lake or a fancy lobby, don't stay here.

"Lived up to its great reviews . . . now here's mine " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/26/2009 Vote

8. We had some great Thai food in the Big Bowl on 60 EAst Ohio St if you fancy something spicier.

"Fantastic stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/18/2009 Vote

9. This is not a luxury, fancy, hotel but a comfortable, friendly 'home away from home'.

"Great Stay at Hampton Inn Majestic " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/28/2009 Vote

10. This hotel does not have the fancy entryway/foyer area, but oh my.

"The ONLY place to stay in downtown Chicago!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/18/2009 Vote