Hilton Washington Dc, Washington DC, Helpful

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Hilton Washington Dc

OpinionWell
Rank

49th

Out of 279

Hilton Washington Dc	Average Price: $277 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1919 Connecticut Avenue NorthWest

Washington DC, 20009 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 12 of 30
Average review rating: 2.92

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (4) , Expedia (25) , Travelocity (8) , TripAdvisor (648)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

acceptable (18) accommodating (13) adequate (29) attentive (14) awesome (14) beautiful (35) best (56) better (65) big (70) cares (23) cheaper (12) clean (250) comfortable (177) comfy (15) convenient (64) cool (17) courteous (24) decent (37) efficient (23) excellent (64) exceptional (37) fabulous (11) fancy (12) fantastic (25) free (143) fresh (19) friendly (164) fun (10) generous (15) good (345) great (340) happy (32) helpful (156) huge (47) liked (166) love (52) new (84) nice (341) outstanding (12) perfect (29) pleasant (49) plenty (57) positive (15) professional (26) quiet (42) reasonable (55) spacious (24) terrific (11) welcoming (19) wonderful (37)

Helpful

Appears in 171 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Helpful:
bar (6) clean (8) comfortable (6) concierge (12) courteous (8) desk (17) extremely (8) friendly (51) good (12) great (11) hotel (25) location (10) most (7) nice (7) not (20) pleasant (9) renovation (7) room (20) service (5) staff (107)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Stayed here in April 2012, arrived after 10pm, check in very quick and efficient, Norm was very helpful with maps and how to get to various attractions.

"Good location.... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

2. He was courteous helpful and informative.

"Awesome hotel world class! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/1/2012 Vote

3. Lastly, I went down to get help from the concierge at 8:30 on a Friday night, only to find out that the concierge had already left.

"Good deal, convenient location, pet friendly. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

4. Seriously? The front desk was as helpful as they could be, but this was just odd.

"Good deal, convenient location, pet friendly. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

5. Staff was friendly and mostly helpful, but for the money it definately was not worth it.

"Very comfortable beds " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

6. In their favour, they used every bit of available space wisely and tucked in a drawer and extra shelving to help, along with another one of those sliding along the wall doors and herein lies the problem.

"Good deal, convenient location, pet friendly. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

7. Conveniently located, clean, and helpful staff.

"Washington Hilton " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/24/2012 Vote

8. The beds and pillows were very comfortable, the staff was very friendly and helpful.

"Washington Hilton, Washington, DC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

9. I actually forgot something in my room after check out and they were really helpful with retrieving it.

"Nice stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

10. I hope this helps.

"Nice-But a bit pricey for the per diem traveler!!! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote