Palace Station Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Unfortunate

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Palace Station Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

50th

Out of 481

Palace Station Las Vegas	Average Price: $87 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2411 West Sahara

Las Vegas, 89102 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 4 of 99
Average review rating: 3.3

OpinionWell Value Index: 4

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (9) , Expedia (98) , MyTravelGuide (102) , Travelocity (128) , TripAdvisor (655) , YahooTravel (94)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (7) avoid (17) awful (8) bad (68) bed bugs (6) complain (25) complaint (15) dated (11) difficult (10) dirty (31) disappoint (27) disgust (8) dispute (7) dump (6) expensive (21) gross (8) hard (27) hassle (6) hate (6) horrible (20) issue (18) lack (8) loud (12) mildew (5) mistake (7) mold (8) nasty (9) negative (14) noise (24) noisy (22) odor (14) poor (17) problem (56) ridiculous (6) rock (14) rude (20) sick (14) slow (23) smell (89) smelly (7) smoker (11) stink (5) terrible (16) tiny (10) uncomfortable (7) unfortunate (15) unhappy (7) worn (8) worst (24) wrong (16)

Unfortunate

Appears in 19 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Unfortunate:
average (2) experience (2) fee (2) hotel (4) liked (2) much (2) not (5) room (6)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. unfortunately, I have to take this to the Attorney General's office and BBB based on principle.

"charged for internet on top of resort fee " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/20/2012 Vote

2. unfortunately the hotel rooms are lacking only slightly but added to the poor service we received, I wouldn't stay here again.

"Tower Suite is pretty nice " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2012 Vote

3. unfortunately, we were always too full to try one of the amazing desserts showcased at the bottom of the stairway outside of the Cafe.

"Fantastic Experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/15/2012 Vote

4. unfortunately, when he decided to book the trip, Caesar's Palace was booked and we decided to stay at Palace Sation.

"Average rooms, clean bathrooms. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/14/2011 Vote

5. unfortunately there were no channels like HBO or showtime.

"a nice stay " Read full review on Expedia 1/5/2010 Vote

6. Our mistake maybe not staying in the tower rooms as the other rooms were not sooo great including the bldg itself although the bathroom was nicely remodeled but the rest of the room was not (unfortunately) The carpet in the bldg was old and smelly.

"Not Impressed " Read full review on Expedia 9/30/2009 Vote

7. unfortunately, that was not my experience.

"Define "palace" " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/11/2009 Vote

8. unfortunately, we were at "Palace Station", so it wasn't so much "fabulous" as it was "repulsive".

"Define "palace" " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/11/2009 Vote

9. unfortunately with the resort fee, the price can be almost as much as many of the downtown and chepaer strip hotels.

"Very Clean rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/7/2009 Vote

10. [--]Nobody likes to be robbed and kidnapped by involuntary hidden fee, but unfortunately I ran into a situation with Palace Station Hotel in Las Vegas.

"Dishonest shady business, disappointed with their 100% shady additional charge " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/13/2009 Vote