4 Queens, Las Vegas, Issue

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » 4 Queens

OpinionWell
Rank

55th

Out of 481

4 Queens	Average Price: $58 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

202 Fremont Street

Las Vegas, 89101 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 99
Average review rating: 3.82

OpinionWell Value Index: 10

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (14) , Expedia (99) , MyTravelGuide (329) , Travelocity (68) , TripAdvisor (698) , YahooTravel (76)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (7) avoid (7) awful (5) bad (82) bed bugs (15) big deal (10) bit dated (7) broken (6) complain (30) complaint (30) crap (15) damage (5) dated (12) difficult (6) dirty (23) disappoint (35) disgust (10) disturbing (7) downside (7) expensive (24) hard (29) hardly (6) hassle (9) horrible (12) irritate (5) issue (46) lack (8) loud (48) mess (8) mistake (13) negative (13) noise (84) noisy (20) odor (9) outdated (9) overpriced (5) problem (78) ridiculous (6) rock (9) rude (34) slow (32) smell (49) smoker (8) terrible (10) tiny (18) uncomfortable (7) unfortunate (14) worn (11) worst (10) wrong (21)

Issue

Appears in 49 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Issue:
big (3) clean (3) experience (3) hotel (8) management (3) music (3) noise (5) not (22) pillow (2) room (10) rude (3) service (4) shower (3) sink (3) small (2) smoke (2) staff (7) street (2) toilets (2) water (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The cons to this hotel is smaller gambling options (I did terrible there) and the food for our first lunch here was not good at all,the server lady that does the drinks could not remember 4 kinds of drinks and then got it wrong on our meals on several issues.

"Great service...all in all pretty good! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/3/2012 Vote

2. The staff for the most part were friendly and curteous, I did have an issue with a bartender at the Chicago Brew pub.

"Four Queens Hotel and Casino " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

3. (I have strong issues with cigarette smoke.

"It was okay - not spectacular. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/21/2011 Vote

4. The bathroom was a more worn than the rest of the room but I did not experience significant drain issues as reported by others.

"Acceptable just not Exciting " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2011 Vote

5. No issues what-so-ever.

"Nice stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/7/2010 Vote

6. This should not be an issue for anyone else as Binion's hotel has been closed for 8 months now.

"Good price for a good room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/22/2010 Vote

7. Check-in and check-out were a little more of a hassle because of the Binion's issue as they were juggling between two different reservation systems.

"Good price for a good room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/22/2010 Vote

8. Then we had an issue with the Magnolia resturant, The waiter was very rude and acted like he was high on some kind of drugs.

"I loved Freemont Street " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2010 Vote

9. Second room, shower issues and smelly, not very clean.

"Was a regular customer... " Read full review on Expedia 1/13/2010 Vote

10. If you're a light sleeper you can hear the Fremont Street music so make note if that's an issue.

"Not bad for a cheap crash pad - toilet blew up " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/9/2010 Vote