4 Queens, Las Vegas, Horrible

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » 4 Queens

OpinionWell
Rank

55th

Out of 481

4 Queens	Average Price: $58 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

202 Fremont Street

Las Vegas, 89101 View map

2-Star Hotel Rank: 6 of 99
Average review rating: 3.82

OpinionWell Value Index: 10

Traveler reviews analyzed: YahooTravel (76) , MyTravelGuide (329) , Travelocity (68) , Expedia (99) , TripAdvisor (698) , BedBugRegistry (14)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (3/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	Recent comments complained about room smell.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (7) avoid (7) awful (5) bad (82) bed bugs (15) big deal (10) bit dated (7) broken (6) complain (30) complaint (30) crap (15) damage (5) dated (12) difficult (6) dirty (23) disappoint (35) disgust (10) disturbing (7) downside (7) expensive (24) hard (29) hardly (6) hassle (9) horrible (12) irritate (5) issue (46) lack (8) loud (48) mess (8) mistake (13) negative (13) noise (84) noisy (20) odor (9) outdated (9) overpriced (5) problem (78) ridiculous (6) rock (9) rude (34) slow (32) smell (49) smoker (8) terrible (10) tiny (18) uncomfortable (7) unfortunate (14) worn (11) worst (10) wrong (21)

Horrible

Appears in 18 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Horrible:
bad (3) bathroom (2) experience (3) hotel (5) liked (2) most (2) not (7) room (10) toilets (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. horrible service.

"The most disgusting room ever; " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/12/2012 Vote

2. No, not Vegas-kitsch - just horrible quality and taste.

"Awful hotel and terrible service. Stay clear! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/29/2011 Vote

3. Comps here were not too bad but the odds at this casino are horrible.

"Left alot to be desired. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/20/2011 Vote

4. Rooms: horrible.

"Great Location, Great Staff, Horrible Room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/10/2010 Vote

5. Our room was clean and the beds were actually comfortable, yes they are a little outdated but not horribly.

"Great Hotel Great Price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/26/2010 Vote

6. The sheets were grey and I had a horrible feeling they hadn't been washed as they were soft, not crisp and fresh like you'd expect.

"Invest in a better quality hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/30/2010 Vote

7. It's not horrible and you'll be fine staying here, but for $20 more a night you could stay at the Golden Nugget, or you could stay for cheaper in the remodeled rooms in the Fremont hotel.

"You get what you paid for... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/24/2010 Vote

8. Cons: Slow elevator, tiny room and bathroom (you can't sit on the toilet and close the bathroom door at the same time), extremely smokey casino (I know they all are, but this was particularly bad), horrible plumbing (the shower felt like a midget peeing on you and the you had to hold the toilet handle for 10 seconds to flush it then listen to it run for 5 solid minutes).

"You get what you paid for... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/24/2010 Vote

9. It was a horrible show and experiance.

"RUDE PEOPLE AND A SCAM TO SEE SHOW " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/8/2009 Vote

10. As one of the previous posters said, yes the hotel is old, yes the walls are a little thin, but I have paid 5 times as much for a room elsewhere & had it be a horrible room.

"Awesome 1st time on Fremont " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/25/2009 Vote