Marriott Las Vegas, Las Vegas, Negative

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Nevada » Las Vegas Destinations » Las Vegas Hotels » Marriott Las Vegas

OpinionWell
Rank

37th

Out of 481

Marriott Las Vegas	Average Price: $205 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

221 North Rampart Boulevard

Las Vegas, 89145 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 15 of 28
Average review rating: 4.54

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (15) , Expedia (24) , MyTravelGuide (183) , Travelocity (9) , TripAdvisor (575) , YahooTravel (39)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (4) annoy (11) avoid (9) awful (8) bad (35) bed bugs (9) big deal (8) chipped (7) complain (8) complaint (19) dated (7) difficult (5) dirty (9) disappoint (21) disgust (6) downside (8) dull (3) expensive (19) frustrated (4) hard (18) hassle (5) hectic (5) horrible (7) inconvenient (7) issue (24) lack (5) loud (7) mad (5) mediocre (4) mistake (6) negative (12) noise (25) noisy (9) outdated (5) poor (13) pricey (14) problem (38) rock (85) rude (4) sad (8) slow (12) smell (18) smoker (4) terrible (8) tiny (4) unfortunate (8) weird (7) worn (10) worst (6) wrong (8)

Negative

Appears in 19 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Negative:
experience (2) hotel (4) lacking (2) need (2) not (4) rock (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. If I had to search for a negative and it is not easy on this one - the staff at breakfast had to be the most unfriendly ever, cannot remmeber the gentlmans name but on our last morning he raised the bar for the others as he was excellent.

"Definitely worth a visit " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

2. This negative aspect of our stay was kind of icky.

"Wonderful hotel with house keeping problems. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/21/2012 Vote

3. The only thing negative to say about this experience is that the patio could have been swept, but it is autumn so things are falling rapidly.

"Amazing customer service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/31/2011 Vote

4. The negatives included: room was in poor condition/old and needed upgrading (bath fixtures broken/loose), several on-site restaurants closed, clumsy layout of hotel with no 'gathering place' found in many other JW Marriott facilities.

"Beautiful off strip hotel, in need of a refresh and more visitors. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/10/2011 Vote

5. All in all, its still a good value but you need to see if the positives outweigh the negatives for you.

"Mixed Bag " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/4/2010 Vote

6. Too many negatives and way too many other choices.

"Not the best Marriott experience I've had " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/5/2009 Vote

7. The negatives: Things could have been a bit cleaner.

"Very nice, could be tidier " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/8/2009 Vote

8. The one negative for the hotel is that the casino is kind of lacking compared to the strip and even comparing it to the Red Rock.

"Always a great Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/31/2008 Vote

9. The one negative for the hotel is that the casino is kind of lacking compared to the strip and even comparing it to the Red Rock.

"Always a great Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/31/2008 Vote

10. I have nothing negative to report about the JW Marriott.

"Not one bad thing to say " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/13/2007 Vote