Liaison Capitol Hill, An Affinia Hotel, Washington DC, Expensive

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Liaison Capitol Hill, An Affinia Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

37th

Out of 279

Liaison Capitol Hill, An Affinia Hotel	Average Price: $316 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

415 new Jersey Avenue NorthWest

Washington DC, 20001 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 16 of 58
Average review rating: 3

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (25) , TripAdvisor (582) , YahooTravel (1)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	Recent comments complained about parking fees.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit small (11) annoy (11) avoid (12) awful (6) bad (33) broken (7) chipped (7) complain (15) complaint (22) damage (7) difficult (11) dirty (12) disappoint (39) disturbing (8) downside (16) dull (6) expensive (73) frustrated (5) hard (32) hardly (5) horrible (10) inconvenient (8) irritate (6) issue (45) lack (13) loud (20) mess (5) mistake (6) mold (9) negative (26) noise (46) noisy (16) odor (5) outrageous (5) overpriced (11) peeling (7) poor (13) pricey (28) problem (60) ridiculous (16) rock (5) rude (11) slow (16) smell (34) terrible (14) tiny (23) uncomfortable (12) unfortunate (18) unpleasant (5) wrong (10)

Expensive

Appears in 78 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Expensive:
$ (9) breakfast (10) car (4) eat (6) expense (79) food (8) garage (5) good (12) great (7) hotel (22) much (5) negative (5) not (11) park (41) price (4) ridiculous (4) room (15) service (5) street (4) valet (5)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It's also close to some restaurants and have their own bar/restaurant near the lobby but it was fairly expensive.

"Great location to see the city " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/22/2012 Vote

2. breakfast to expensive, there is a starbuck very close where you can have a nice breakfast.

"small room, big price, great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/19/2012 Vote

3. I left my very expensive raincoat in the room closet.

"Perfect for my trip " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

4. It was excellent, but very very expensive.

"Clean, trendy, a nice stay. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/27/2012 Vote

5. Parking at the hotel very expensive,suggest going around the corner where the rates are more reasonable.

"Liasion Hotel, Wash. D.C. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

6. Got a great deal for a 4 star hotel on name your own price, but beware as the parking is VERY EXPENSIVE.

"Boutique Hotel within view of the Capital " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/2/2012 Vote

7. Parking is hard to find and expensive, (I think hotel charge is also very expensive overnight, but am not sure.

"Wonderful first experience in DC " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/25/2012 Vote

8. A nice hotel with good restaurant but very expensive even by DC standards.

"Boutique hotel close to the Capitol " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/5/2012 Vote

9. The decor was really tasteful and modern with seemingly no expense spared on lights, furnishings and finishing touches.

"Superb Hotel in Excellent Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/1/2012 Vote

10. As regards the refurb, it seems strange that they go to all this trouble and expense, yet don't bother to double-glaze the windows, and having a fire station next door doesn't help.

"Almost perfect ... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/20/2012 Vote