Wyndham Austin, Austin, Badly

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Texas » Austin Destinations » Austin Hotels » Wyndham Austin

OpinionWell
Rank

14th

Out of 287

Wyndham Austin	Average Price: $133 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

3401 South IH35

Austin, 78741 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 8 of 23
Average review rating: 3.85

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (2) , MyTravelGuide (10) , TripAdvisor (157) , YahooTravel (10)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

annoy (2) awful (2) bad (20) badly (2) bed bugs (3) bugs (3) complain (6) complaint (6) cramped (2) dated (3) difficult (3) dirty (6) disappoint (7) downside (2) expensive (2) filthy (3) hard (7) hate (2) horrible (8) issue (17) lack (2) loud (10) mess (2) mistake (2) mold (5) negative (4) nightmare (2) noise (14) noisy (5) odor (2) overpriced (2) problem (11) rock (2) rough (2) rude (4) sick (2) smell (9) stained (3) stunk (1) tacky (2) terrible (2) threadbare (1) tiny (2) uncomfortable (4) unfortunate (5) weird (2) worn (2) worst (3) wrong (3) yucky (1)

Badly

Appears in 23 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Badly:
attitude (2) average (2) bad (23) clean (3) desk (2) didnt (2) expectation (2) experience (2) floor (3) food (2) free (2) good (2) guest (2) hotel (8) night (3) not (5) reviews (3) room (12) smell (2) toilets (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The only bad incident we encountered was when we first arrived, the toilet did not flush.

"Good hotel, great attentiveness! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/23/2012 Vote

2. Some of the bad reviews scared me so I expected the worse but overall it was a good night.

"Not bad for an older hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/31/2011 Vote

3. Too bad almost no hotel guests utilized them during my stay.

"Good Experience, But Not Really a 3.5-Star Property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/2/2011 Vote

4. I had stayed at various hotels in Austin and have not had any bad experiences.

"Austin at the Wyndham " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/26/2011 Vote

5. I had read bad reviews on this hotel and was quite concerned about my stay there.

"Austin at the Wyndham " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/26/2011 Vote

6. We've had several bad experiences with hotels in Austin lately, so this one was a breath of fresh air.

"Nice hotel and great staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/15/2011 Vote

7. To know that I could have received these free amenities only after the fact is very frustrating and left a bad impression.

"Big problem with communication leaves bad impression! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/23/2011 Vote

8. When I went to check out that room, it was obvious that it needed a good clearning, but I was so tired, their attitude was so bad, that I did not want to deal with moving the 3rd time.

"Big problem with communication leaves bad impression! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/23/2011 Vote

9. When I was leaving I asked to have the manager call me rather than just write a bad review.

"Big problem with communication leaves bad impression! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/23/2011 Vote

10. The bad was the room had a damp musty smell upon entering, the thermostat did not work at all, either the room was to cold or too warm which made for a sleepless night.

"Not your typical Wyndam property " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/23/2011 Vote