Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Seneca Hotel Chicago
Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
68th
Out of 415

Seneca Hotel Chicago

Average Price: $165  
 
Hotel Class:
200 East Chestnut
Chicago, 60611 View map  
3-Star Hotel Rank: 26 of 73
Average review rating: 3.67
OpinionWell Value Index: 7
Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (43) , MyTravelGuide (72) , Travelocity (51) , TripAdvisor (425) , YahooTravel (41)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Terrible
Appears in 18 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Terrible:
bed (5)   floor (3)   food (2)   helpful (2)   horrible (2)   hotel (4)   internet (2)   kitchen (2)   nice (2)   not (3)   room (6)   service (2)   small (2)   suite (2)   toilets (2)   water (2)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
See all
1. The Chestnut cafe is alright and the other restaurant has terrible food.
"An Old, Dirty Apartment " Read full review on TripAdvisor   8/20/2011 Vote      
2. The king bed suite I got was terrible.
"Well-located, but highly overrated. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   9/4/2010 Vote      
3. The king bed suite I got was terrible.
"Well-located, but highly overrated. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   9/4/2010 Vote      
4. And then, even worse, people who masquerade as knowledgeable about their terrible Internet service who are 'trying to help.
"Loved the Room, Hated the Service " Read full review on TripAdvisor   5/8/2010 Vote      
5. the internet is complimentary for a reason, meaning it was terrible and if they were to charge, there would be many complaints.
"Get what you pay " Read full review on TripAdvisor   3/4/2010 Vote      
6. We were put in a spacious room when we checked in, complete with a full kitchen, however the bed was terribly firm, so after one night of trying to just deal with it, the next morning I asked if we could be moved to a room with a softer bed.
"Lovely Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor   3/3/2010 Vote      
7. was ancient and got terrible reception.
"so much potential, yet fails " Read full review on TripAdvisor   8/12/2008 Vote      
8. Whenever the toilet was flushed water came pouring out of the back pipes and the sink faucet also had a terrible leak.
"Stay again at the right price " Read full review on Travelocity   8/1/2008 Vote      
9. The lobby was nice, no concierge, but the rooms are dated, and the bed was terrible.
"Great location, hated the beds " Read full review on TripAdvisor   11/21/2007 Vote      
10. And I think the rating of horrible needs to be added below terrible in order to describe our experience.
"Awful experience " Read full review on TripAdvisor   10/18/2006 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved