Back to search results
OpinionWell
Rank
53rd
Out of 493

Warwick Regis Hotel

Average Price: $180  
 
Hotel Class:
490 Geary Street At Taylor
San Francisco, 00000 View map  
3-Star Hotel Rank: 18 of 110
Average review rating: 3.87
OpinionWell Value Index: 3
Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (40) , MyTravelGuide (377) , Travelocity (17) , TripAdvisor (318) , YahooTravel (12)
SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)
Skip Navigation Links
Keyword Cloud
The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.
Worn
Appears in 9 comments. 
The following words were used in comments with Worn:
clean (2)   hotel (3)   not (2)   redone (2)   room (6)    
Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.
Sort by:
1. Drawbacks to the room were poor quality mattress and bedding, radiant ceiling heat that made regulating room temperature difficult, and worn roll window shades that didn't work easily.
"Conveniet Union Square Boutique Hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor   3/22/2012 Vote      
2. Room was a little worn as it is not a modern property, sink did not fit in bathroom so was located amongst bedroom by door.
"Warwick, old-fashioned charm & conveniently located " Read full review on TripAdvisor   11/17/2009 Vote      
3. The rooms are nicely furnished and very very clean, although some of the plumbing fixtures are a bit worn, such as faucets that don't turn off easily.
"Small, Friendly, nicely kept Hotel in the heart of the action. " Read full review on TripAdvisor   9/21/2009 Vote      
4. The carpet was fairly worn and the remodel is aging but the room was clean and comfortable.
"Pleasant Stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor   7/28/2008 Vote      
5. The rooms were tiny and I found it to be a little tired and worn out, but it was nonetheless a pleasant small hotel.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   2/26/2007 Vote      
6. Lobby and elevator a little worn.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   12/1/2005 Vote      
7. Slightly worn.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   10/31/2005 Vote      
8. Although supposedly fully redone in 2002, the hotel looks worn and dated.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   10/19/2005 Vote      
9. Although supposedly fully redone in 2002, the hotel looks worn and dated.
Read full review on MyTravelGuide   10/19/2005 Vote      
   
About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Site Map
© 2010 OpinionWell, LLC, All Rights Reserved