The Henley Park Hotel, Washington DC, Loud

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » The Henley Park Hotel

OpinionWell
Rank

41st

Out of 279

The Henley Park Hotel	Average Price: $261 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

926 Massachusetts Avenue NorthWest

Washington DC, 20001 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 19 of 58
Average review rating: 3.84

OpinionWell Value Index: 3

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (36) , TripAdvisor (183) , YahooTravel (7)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

a bit pricey (1) annoy (3) avoid (2) awful (2) bad (10) badly (1) big problem (2) bit dated (2) broken (2) complain (9) complaint (6) cramped (4) disappoint (6) disturbing (4) downside (4) errors (3) expensive (9) frustrated (2) hard (6) hardly (2) hate (4) issue (11) lack (5) loud (8) mess (2) misleading (4) mold (2) negative (6) noise (81) noisy (14) overpriced (8) poor (4) pricey (10) problem (24) ridiculous (3) rude (3) sad (1) shabby (1) slow (5) smell (9) terrible (3) threadbare (1) tiny (14) troublesome (1) unbearable (1) uncomfortable (3) unfortunate (4) unfriendly (2) worst (3) wrong (4)

Loud	Appears in 11 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Loud:
bed (2) construction (2) night (2) noise (3) room (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. After settling in, we heard a loud noise and vibration.

"Some unpleasant surprises " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/16/2012 Vote

2. It's a bit loud there.

"Small, tidy, oldschool hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/19/2012 Vote

3. Bed was comfortable though street noise could be loud at times.

"Cute hotel with interesting staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/6/2010 Vote

4. It is very noisy in the mornings, all the doors slam loudly so anytime someone came or left on my floor it would jolt me awake.

"Nice but wouldn't recommend it " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/18/2010 Vote

5. Just as I did start managing to nod off I was woken up at 6:30 am (this happened every morning) by a large gang of construction workers and their loudly beeping vehicles.

"Good service and location marred by high noise levels " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2009 Vote

6. My room (607) looked out right over the air conditioning unit of a building on the other side of 10th and the din was so loud I barely slept.

"Good service and location marred by high noise levels " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/15/2009 Vote

7. The view from the room is of the courtyard which is draped in plastic for ???renovations??? There was loud banging all throughout the night as if the kitchen were below us, but it was obviously not open all night.

"If they mess up, it's still your fault. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/21/2009 Vote

8. Later that evening after coming back from dinner (around 11pm) and trying to go to bed, we were again treated with very loud noise from the hallway from a wedding party.

"Would not stay here again... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2008 Vote

9. The loud music continued for close to a half hour before I called the front desk to complain.

"Would not stay here again... " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2008 Vote

10. I didn`t hear my neighbors much, so either I was the loud one or the walls are thicker than those found in newer hotels.

"Excellent Choice! Worth every penny! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/30/2007 Vote