Park Manor Suites, San Diego, Lobby

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » San Diego Destinations » San Diego Hotels » Park Manor Suites

OpinionWell
Rank

65th

Out of 517

Park Manor Suites	Average Price: $174 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

525 Spruce

San Diego, 92103 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 32 of 101
Average review rating: 3.82

OpinionWell Value Index: 5

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (3) , Expedia (38) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (175) , YahooTravel (18)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (7) balcony (15) bar (30) bath (5) bathroom (48) bathtub (5) beach (7) bed (35) breakfast (90) charge (4) check in (10) check out (6) closet (23) complimentary (14) cost (6) deal (10) decor (10) dinner (16) downtown (22) food (36) front desk (26) hotel (293) housekeeping (5) lobby (18) location (87) lunch (6) manager (9) money (6) neighborhood (22) parking (51) pillow (6) pool (5) price (26) rate (13) recommend (21) restaurant (79) room (315) service (37) shower (8) staff (97) street (49) suite (80) to park (4) tub (6) valet (7) valet parking (9) value (13) view (52) walk (52) wireless (13)

Lobby

Appears in 18 comments.

100% wrote positive comments about lobby

The following words were used in comments with Lobby:
beauty (2) ceiling (2) desk (2) hotel (4) location (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. So I didn't see much of what the lobby was supposed to look like.

"Above Average " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2012 Vote

2. WiFi was nonexistent, except in the lobby and restaurant areas.

"My affection for this place is guarded " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/23/2012 Vote

3. There was a line to check in so I browsed the very nice lobby filled with European antiques.

"My own little San Diego apartment " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/8/2011 Vote

4. The ceiling in the lobby is beautiful and apparently the new owners surprisingly uncovered it during renovations.

"Beautiful and Comfortable " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2011 Vote

5. To bring this wonderful old building into the 21st century would require a drastic gutting (but please preserve the great lobby!) and refitting and finishing.

"Converted 1926 apartment by Balboa Park, Hillcrest NO AC but capacious " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/27/2008 Vote

6. Beautiful lobby, and It is fairly centrally located, close to zoo, balboa park and short ride to downtown.

"Great Wedding Night " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/24/2008 Vote

7. The lobby was the best part of the hotel.

"Hot, Mildewy, Noisy! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/17/2007 Vote

8. When I came to this hotel, the lobby was under construction.

"Above Average " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/10/2012 Vote

9. The property has a roof-top terrace with 360 degree panoramic view of the city; the rooms are very large, with high vaulted ceilings and apartment-style layouts, with kitchens, living rooms, etc.The lobby and restaurants are all top-notch (albeit a little dated, until renovations are complete).

"Inn at the Park (San Diego) - a 1920's jewel gets a sparkling polish! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/18/2012 Vote

10. One needed to go to a lobby many times to use the internet-Good location for seeing Balboa Park, San Diego Zoo, Hillcrest and Museum area by walking.

"Nice old time feeling " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/25/2012 Vote