Custom Hotel Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Valet

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » California » Los Angeles Destinations » Los Angeles Hotels » Custom Hotel Los Angeles

OpinionWell
Rank

29th

Out of 700

Custom Hotel Los Angeles	Average Price: $114 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

8639 Lincoln Boulevard

Los Angeles, 90045 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 12 of 84
Average review rating: 3.49

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (29) , MyTravelGuide (33) , Travelocity (4) , TripAdvisor (373)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (2/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (32) bar (141) bath (13) bathroom (88) beach (42) bed (139) bill (16) breakfast (107) charge (44) check in (56) check out (19) closet (25) complimentary (15) cost (33) deal (28) decor (50) dinner (13) fee (22) food (71) front desk (100) gym (15) hotel (957) lobby (116) location (108) manager (18) money (19) neighborhood (16) parking (138) pillow (19) pool (182) price (78) rate (47) recommend (48) restaurant (124) room (697) room service (15) service (134) shower (46) shuttle (103) staff (210) street (43) suite (24) to park (19) towel (17) valet (90) valet parking (60) value (29) view (44) walk (40) wireless (45)

Valet

Appears in 90 comments.

66% wrote positive comments about valet

The following words were used in comments with Valet:
good (4) helpful (7) hotel (9) nice (11) night (14)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. Wish there was an option for paid self park at their parking structure but it wasn't too bad to valet.

"Definitely not your ordinary boutique hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

2. The valet attendants were really nice and gave good directions on getting around town.

"Definitely not your ordinary boutique hotel " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/2/2012 Vote

3. Valet parking only but they were super nice (24 hr valet).

"OMG, I'm in love. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/16/2012 Vote

4. so valet parking is safer option plus the valet service is pretty good.

"Basic but fun " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/12/2012 Vote

5. the valet who helped with my car ($20 for parking) when I arrived was very friendly and helpful, and so was the lady at check-in; unfortunately I didn't get names.

"nice design, minor issues " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/31/2011 Vote

6. However-some cool upgrades from the previous version; improved: valet (but you pay for it), lobby area, room nuances/media.

"Good value, but not a premier boutique...yet " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/23/2011 Vote

7. Valet is fast and super polite too!i have never been ANYWHERE with so many nice staff people.

"Amazing Staff and food! my new fav hotel! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/16/2011 Vote

8. The Valet driver was kind and very friendly though.

"Dont believe the web-site, not what it appears " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/3/2011 Vote

9. The valet guys were very nice and helpful however, when we complained about not having a free breakfast which most any upper end hotels have as well as the coffee maker, the woman at the desk acted as though she had never heard of such a thing.

"Will never stay here again! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 6/10/2011 Vote

10. When I arrived, I wasn't initially expecting valet-only parking, but the valet was incredibly nice.

"Excellent customer service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/8/2011 Vote