Hyatt Chicago, Chicago, Sheets

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Illinois » Chicago Destinations » Chicago Hotels » Hyatt Chicago

OpinionWell
Rank

54th

Out of 415

Hyatt Chicago	Average Price: $261 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2233 South Martin Luther King Drive

Chicago, 60616-9985 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 25 of 39
Average review rating: 3.56

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (8) , Expedia (39) , MyTravelGuide (1895) , Travelocity (13) , TripAdvisor (315) , YahooTravel (27)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	Recent comments complained about noise.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (22) bar (40) bath (9) bathroom (35) bed (60) breakfast (44) charge (23) check in (39) check out (12) closet (13) concierge (29) cost (22) deal (30) dinner (21) downtown (140) fee (13) fitness center (9) food (75) front desk (61) gym (20) hotel (680) housekeeping (19) lake (45) lobby (49) location (136) manager (17) money (24) neighborhood (18) parking (102) pillow (12) pool (42) price (63) rate (39) recommend (36) restaurant (121) room (539) room service (32) service (110) sheets (11) shower (21) shuttle (42) staff (192) street (20) suite (26) towel (15) valet (17) value (13) view (125) walk (86) wireless (23)

Sheets

Appears in 11 comments.

100% wrote positive comments about sheets

The following words were used in comments with Sheets:
clean (3) comfortable (3) excellent (2) mattress (2) soft (2) stains (3) towel (2)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. The bed was comfortable and the sheets soft, but towels not soft.

"A captive audience near the convention center " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/3/2012 Vote

2. They were fresh sheets all pressed and tight but there were brown stains on the edges.

"Failure on many counts " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

3. the furnishings wer excellent, the bed fairly comfortable, but the sheets were too short, The top sheep was tucked in such a manner that when the bed was turned to sleep in, the sheets came loose and were wrinkly to sleep on.

"Disappointing " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/23/2011 Vote

4. Room was clean--clean bathroom, no stains, clean sheets.

"Decent room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/16/2010 Vote

5. Twice I've stayed here and twice the sheets in a new room showed stains.

"Failure on many counts " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/13/2012 Vote

6. Also, one night the top bed sheets had an obvious rip and hole in them as well.

"Just Decent " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/4/2011 Vote

7. The sheets and towels were ripped, and the only response from the front desk was 'we will replace the sheets for you.

"A Hyatt name with Motel 6 rooms " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/30/2011 Vote

8. Bed sheets too short for the mattress.

"Better off at a Holiday Inn " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/18/2008 Vote

9. Bed was excellent, with very good pillows although sheets were thread bare.

"Do not stay here unless you must be near convention center. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/11/2009 Vote

10. Third, the walls really are paper thin (and I'm pretty noise tolerant in general)Finally, the sheets on the bed are weird - the bottom sheet is thin (so thin you can see through to the mattress0 and doesn't tuck under the head of the bed, and the sheets around the comforter don't seal.

"Little details make all the (annoying) difference " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/31/2009 Vote