Hyatt Regency on the Hudson, Jersey City, Cost

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » New Jersey » Jersey City Hotels » Hyatt Regency on the Hudson

OpinionWell
Rank

1st

Out of 23

Hyatt Regency on the Hudson	Average Price: $359 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

2 Exchange Place

Jersey City, 07302 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 2
Average review rating: 4.51

OpinionWell Value Index: 10

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (40) , MyTravelGuide (759) , TripAdvisor (259) , YahooTravel (20)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (10) bar (58) bathroom (27) bed (33) bill (7) breakfast (98) charge (24) check in (33) check out (11) complimentary (11) concierge (17) cost (27) deal (11) dinner (30) downtown (22) fee (11) fitness center (9) food (89) front desk (44) gym (21) hotel (648) housekeeping (8) lobby (26) location (138) lunch (11) manager (15) money (19) parking (37) pillow (7) pool (45) price (63) rate (37) recommend (41) restaurant (123) room (461) room service (17) service (122) shower (17) staff (160) street (37) suite (9) to park (7) towel (9) valet (20) valet parking (10) value (24) view (331) walk (52) waterfront (7) wireless (7)

Cost	Appears in 27 comments. 80% wrote positive comments about cost

The following words were used in comments with Cost:

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. It was a gesture that probably only cost the property a few dollars but it was unexpected, a touch that communicated the hotel actually cared to earn my future business - without even know what that future business might be.

"Spectacular Choice for the Business Traveller " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/28/2012 Vote

2. Getting to the WTC site is a breeze and only cost $2 Jersey City is very quiet on the weekends and if you want to feel a part of the hustle and bustle and in the city, then staying in midtown Manhatten would be better in that regard.

"NYC Skyline views without NYC Price Tag " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/16/2012 Vote

3. The rooms seem quite large (certainly larger than what you'd get in Manhattan for the same cost) and are incredibly comfortable.

"Great Location for Business and Pleasure " Read full review on TripAdvisor 10/5/2011 Vote

4. Parking cost quite a lot but it is safe and convenient.

"Well worth the bucks for the bang! " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/1/2009 Vote

5. I have to say that although it is not a low cost hotel, the service and view make you forget the price you pay.

"Very Good Hotel, Great View and Nice Service " Read full review on TripAdvisor 5/7/2012 Vote

6. Even a cup of self serve coffee in the lobby costs $3.

"Very nice hotel and location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/12/2012 Vote

7. Alternatively, a taxi would cost about $60.

"Great base from which to visit New York City " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/5/2012 Vote

8. So add that to the cost of the room.

"Rooms with a view " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/1/2012 Vote

9. The breakfast room is spectacular, breakfast cost extra but don't miss it, it is the highlight of the day, except for the aircon.

"Perfect place but forget the pool " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/6/2012 Vote

10. Frankly it was far nicer, cleaner, more spacious and less costly than many of the top hotels I have stayed at in NYC.

"Great place, great view, great stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/7/2011 Vote