Ramada Phoenix, Phoenix, Breakfast

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » Arizona » Phoenix Destinations » Phoenix Hotels » Ramada Phoenix

OpinionWell
Rank

48th

Out of 366

Ramada Phoenix	Average Price: $70 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

12027 North 28th Drive

Phoenix, 85029 View map

3-Star Hotel Rank: 29 of 62
Average review rating: 3.5

OpinionWell Value Index: 6

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (85) , MyTravelGuide (6) , Travelocity (16) , TripAdvisor (73) , YahooTravel (8)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction, Remodeling, Renovation.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (5) bar (6) bath (3) bathroom (34) bathtub (3) bed (20) breakfast (92) charge (6) check in (13) complimentary (5) cost (3) deal (4) decor (5) dinner (4) downtown (5) fee (3) fitness center (4) fitness room (5) food (9) freeway (6) front desk (30) highway (4) hot tub (7) hotel (150) housekeeping (3) laundry (3) lobby (9) location (38) manager (19) money (9) neighborhood (3) parking (12) pool (41) price (26) rate (13) recommend (16) restaurant (20) room (252) service (22) shower (18) shuttle (3) spa (2) staff (58) suite (8) towel (8) tub (6) value (14) view (4) walk (4) wireless (11)

Breakfast

Appears in 92 comments.

68% wrote positive comments about breakfast

The following words were used in comments with Breakfast:
clean (7) coffee (6) complimentary (4) continental (13) desk (4) free (9) fruit (7) good (16) great (9) hot (16) hotel (10) juice (5) location (5) nice (12)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. They don't have a breakfast buffet or any free breakfast items.

"Great nights sleep " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/10/2012 Vote

2. when i returned with my grandchildren they had not left clean towels so we went to the front desk and asked for them we got them ok with a big attitude , the next morning we went to try this breakfast bar lol nasty looking food and very dirty area , we put our food in the trash went to our room packed up , stopped by the front desk again and told them how dirty it was and i explained that i own a motel in trasure island florida and could not believe how dirty the place was .

"I would rather sleep in my car " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/26/2011 Vote

3. The free continental breakfast in the AM was rather good by cheap hotel standards, so that's always a plus.

"Strange place...but clean and met our needs " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/6/2011 Vote

4. The Restaurant at the location is closed except for the Continental breakfast.

"In need of a good cleaning " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/27/2011 Vote

5. Considering that the hotel was nice, the room was clean and had two nice beds, nice shower and frig and micro - had a pool and nice hot tub, and then a pretty good breakfast spread.

"Great hotel for the price with pool, hot tub, and free breakfast " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/14/2011 Vote

6. The breakfast was pretty decent as well.

"Very Nice " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/23/2010 Vote

7. The continental breakfast was great.

"I would go back again " Read full review on Expedia 4/22/2010 Vote

8. Unfortunately I was less than pleased about the breakfast offered.

"a good place to stay " Read full review on Expedia 4/21/2010 Vote

9. There is a complimentary breakfast.

"An Affordable Location " Read full review on Expedia 3/24/2010 Vote

10. Free Breakfast.

"A Little Dated " Read full review on Expedia 6/24/2009 Vote