Morrison-Clark Historic Inn, Washington DC, Breakfast

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » » Washington DC Destinations » Washington DC Hotels » Morrison-Clark Historic Inn

OpinionWell
Rank

72nd

Out of 279

Morrison-Clark Historic Inn	Average Price: $249 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

1015 L Street NW,

Washington DC, 20001 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 19 of 30
Average review rating: 3.48

OpinionWell Value Index: 2

Traveler reviews analyzed: BedBugRegistry (1) , Expedia (61) , Travelocity (6) , TripAdvisor (151) , YahooTravel (6)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (1/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	There are recent comments about Construction.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

amenity (9) balcony (6) bar (5) bargain (4) bath (4) bathroom (42) bed (57) bill (6) breakfast (37) brunch (3) charge (15) check in (23) check out (4) closet (7) complimentary (4) cost (8) deal (8) decor (13) dinner (10) discount (5) downtown (10) food (28) front desk (24) hotel (299) housekeeping (4) lobby (15) location (72) manager (15) neighborhood (11) parking (13) pillow (8) price (48) rate (20) recommend (29) refund (3) restaurant (60) room (351) room service (16) service (68) sheets (4) shower (12) staff (146) street (31) suite (14) valet (7) valet parking (6) value (11) view (11) walk (50) wireless (12)

Breakfast

Appears in 37 comments.

83% wrote positive comments about breakfast

The following words were used in comments with Breakfast:
clean (4) comfortable (3) delicious (3) dining (3) enjoy (5) good (9) great (3) hotel (12) liked (5) love (4) nice (5) slow (3) staff (5) well (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. We had a great time and an excellent breakfast completed the picture .

"Excellent welcome, beautiful old hotel. " Read full review on TripAdvisor 3/3/2012 Vote

2. The hotel is lovely and much like a bed and breakfast.

"Great Hotel, Great Staff, Great Price, Great time " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/12/2012 Vote

3. This hotel was charming, more like a bed and breakfast than a hotel.

"one-nite romantic getaway at a great price " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/9/2012 Vote

4. Breakfast was hot, hearty, and tasted great.

"Charming for our anniversary " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/7/2012 Vote

5. We especially enjoyed having a special breakfast in the lovely dining room before we left.

"A one-of-a-kind stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/8/2011 Vote

6. I had a nice breakfast in the lovely dining room.

"Lovely attention to detail " Read full review on TripAdvisor 12/6/2011 Vote

7. From our arrival (Malek on doors), to checking in (our super terrific Joseph) our Sunday morning breakfast hostess and all the other wonderful servers and staff - this place was gracious, met all of our ridiculous requests and only showed us the utmost hospitality and friendliness - the kind you could only hope for.

"Wow on the hotel AND staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/2/2011 Vote

8. ) I also liked sitting in the breakfast room late in the day to relax.

"Nice staff, glad there are still non-chain hotels " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/27/2011 Vote

9. The rooms were clean and comfortable, and we especially enjoyed the common areas (wrap around porch, 'parlor', lovely breakfast room, courtyard).

"Perfect place to stay " Read full review on TripAdvisor 9/25/2011 Vote

10. Breakfast was excellent and a great start to long days of sight seeing.

"Charming with some historic quirks " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/28/2011 Vote