The Carolina Inn, Chapel Hill, Spacious

OpinionWell's Blog

Home » United States » North Carolina » Chapel Hill Destinations » Chapel Hill Hotels » The Carolina Inn

OpinionWell
Rank

2nd

Out of 26

The Carolina Inn	Average Price: $225 Check Rates

Hotel Class:

211 Pittsboro Street

Chapel Hill, 27516 View map

4-Star Hotel Rank: 1 of 3
Average review rating: 4.05

OpinionWell Value Index: 10

Traveler reviews analyzed: Expedia (21) , TripAdvisor (222) , YahooTravel (9)

SAFE TO BOOK ? (0/5 issues found)

Is this hotel safe to book? See the trends in negative comments below to find out the real deal before you commit:

Construction:	No recent comments about construction were found.
Noise:	No recent comments about noise were found.
Room Smell:	No recent comments about room smell were found.
Parking Fees:	No recent comments about parking fees were found.
Bed Bugs:	No recent comments about bed bugs were found.

Search reviews for other problems

Keyword Cloud

The hotel review keyword cloud displays the words commonly used to describe the features and services of this hotel. Select a word and explore.

All Positive Negative

Keyword Search

accommodating (5) attentive (8) attractive (6) beautiful (58) beautifully (14) best (26) better (16) big (14) cares (12) clean (45) comfortable (72) convenient (14) cool (10) courteous (7) cozy (7) decent (6) delicious (18) efficient (10) elegant (21) excellent (37) exceptional (6) fantastic (8) free (18) fresh (11) friendly (68) fun (12) good (65) gorgeous (8) great (90) happy (7) helpful (41) huge (5) liked (46) love (45) luxurious (6) new (23) nice (83) outstanding (11) perfect (32) pleasant (19) plenty (7) professional (7) quiet (18) reasonable (18) spacious (11) superb (6) unbeatable (5) welcoming (19) well appointed (11) wonderful (46)

Spacious

Appears in 11 comments.

The following words were used in comments with Spacious:
area (3) bathroom (2) bed (4) clean (3) comfortable (3) large (2) love (2) queen (3) room (10) well (4)

Users can vote for helpful comments, which are saved in the Most helpful section.

Sort by:

See all

1. My clients' rooms were all spacious and well appointed, as well.

"2 excellent stays--charming, nice sized and plush suites " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

2. My suites were enormous, with a huge sitting area, dining area, as well as a spacious bedroom and bathroom, as well as a second powder for guests.

"2 excellent stays--charming, nice sized and plush suites " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/17/2012 Vote

3. The rooms are spacious and very clean, the beds are comfortable and the best part of the whole experience are the warm chocolate chip cookies you get at check-in.

"Southern Charm, Great location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 2/28/2012 Vote

4. Our room was spacious and comfortable - very tastefully decorated.

"History and Class " Read full review on TripAdvisor 1/10/2012 Vote

5. I had 2 large queen beds, and I thought the room was pretty spacious.

"cozy place with friendly staff " Read full review on TripAdvisor 11/19/2011 Vote

6. The new room was lovely--extremely spacious, with windows on all 3 sides, large amounts of space on both sides of the bed and in front of the bed, and a generously sized seating area with couch and chairs nearby, all with plenty of more space around/between them.

"Business stay--excellent large room and really tiny room " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/7/2011 Vote

7. It was beautifully finished and the bathroom was spacious and clean.

"Southern Hospitality lives here " Read full review on TripAdvisor 7/30/2010 Vote

8. Our room was spacious, comfortable and clean.

"Blue Heaven " Read full review on Expedia 9/9/2009 Vote

9. They upgraded me for $20 to a very nice, spacious standard room, but if there is no availability, Priceline bidders risk being stuck with the historic queen.

"Location Location Location " Read full review on TripAdvisor 8/8/2009 Vote

10. Our room was a double queen, (room 161) and it was spacious.

"Very good if you get a deal " Read full review on TripAdvisor 4/14/2009 Vote